Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Spencer Zim
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Spencer Zim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Spencer Zim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Spencer Zim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Spencer Zim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Spencer Zim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Spencer Zim. The network helps show where Herbert Spencer Zim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert Spencer Zim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert Spencer Zim.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert Spencer Zim based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert Spencer Zim. Herbert Spencer Zim is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zim, Herbert Spencer, et al.. (2004). Yosemite National Park. Medical Entomology and Zoology.12 indexed citations
2.
Zim, Herbert Spencer, et al.. (1987). Trees: A Guide to Familiar American Trees. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Abbott, R. Tucker & Herbert Spencer Zim. (1962). Seashells of the world, a guide to the better-known species. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
8.
Zim, Herbert Spencer & Robert T. Mitchell. (1962). Butterflies And Moths.1 indexed citations
9.
Rhodes, Frank H. T., et al.. (1962). Fossils: A Guide to Prehistoric Life. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
10.
Zim, Herbert Spencer, et al.. (1961). Rocks and Minerals: A Guide to Familiar Minerals, Gems, Ores and Rocks. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
11.
Zim, Herbert Spencer, et al.. (1957). Rocks And Minerals.5 indexed citations
12.
Burnett, R. Will, et al.. (1957). Weather: air masses, clouds, rainfall, storms, weather maps, climate. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
13.
Zim, Herbert Spencer, et al.. (1956). Reptiles and amphibians : a guide to familiar American species.4 indexed citations
14.
Zim, Herbert Spencer, et al.. (1956). Birds: A guide to the most familiar American birds,. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).2 indexed citations
15.
Zim, Herbert Spencer & Lester Ingle. (1955). Seashores : a guide to animals and plants along the beaches : 458 species in full color.1 indexed citations
16.
Zim, Herbert Spencer, et al.. (1955). Fishes: A guide to fresh and salt-water species. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
17.
Buechner, Helmut K., Alexander C. Martin, Herbert Spencer Zim, & Arnold L. Nelson. (1952). American Wildlife and Plants. Bird-Banding. 23(1). 51–51.276 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Hooper, Emmet T., Alexander C. Martin, Herbert Spencer Zim, & Arnold L. Nelson. (1952). American Wildlife and Plants. Journal of Mammalogy. 33(3). 400–400.86 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.