Henriette Schmock
About
In The Last Decade
Henriette Schmock
6 papers receiving 763 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Molecular Biology 221
- Artificial Intelligence 186
- Epidemiology 164
- Clinical Psychology 136
- Genetics 97
Countries citing papers authored by Henriette Schmock
This map shows the geographic impact of Henriette Schmock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henriette Schmock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henriette Schmock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henriette Schmock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henriette Schmock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henriette Schmock. The network helps show where Henriette Schmock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Henriette Schmock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Henriette Schmock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Henriette Schmock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Henriette Schmock. Henriette Schmock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 250 | |
| 6 | 257 | |
| 7 | 218 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.