Henk de Bruin
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
- Co-authors
- J. B. MoncrieffJ.A. ElbersH. SoegaardThomas FriborgAnne VerhoefP. KabatSteph ScottB.G. Heusinkveld
- Topics
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers)Climate variability and models (5 papers)Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
Henk de Bruin
11 papers receiving 996 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Global and Planetary Change 903
- Atmospheric Science 341
- Plant Science 212
- Ecology 196
- Environmental Engineering 167
Countries citing papers authored by Henk de Bruin
This map shows the geographic impact of Henk de Bruin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henk de Bruin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henk de Bruin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henk de Bruin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henk de Bruin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henk de Bruin. The network helps show where Henk de Bruin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Henk de Bruin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Henk de Bruin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Henk de Bruin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Henk de Bruin. Henk de Bruin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | Estimación de evaporación y radiación solar en el valle del Yaqui Sonora usando datos de satélite | 6 |
| 8 | A system to measure surface fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, water vapour and carbon dioxidebreakdown → | 867 |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | Technical Note Skinfold thicknesses: is there a need to be very precise in their location? | 2 |
| 11 | 42 |
About Henk de Bruin
Henk de Bruin is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, History and Philosophy of Science and Atmospheric Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Climate variability and models (5 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (903 citations), Atmospheric Science (341 citations) and Soil Science (116 citations). Henk de Bruin has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include J. B. Moncrieff, J.A. Elbers, H. Soegaard, Thomas Friborg, Anne Verhoef, P. Kabat, Steph Scott, B.G. Heusinkveld, J. M. Massheder and Isabel F. Trigo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hydrology, British Journal Of Nutrition and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.