Hendrik P. Verschuur
- Otorhinolaryngology top 2%
- Surgery
- Neurology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Peter Paul G. van BenthemBas PullensBrian O’SullivanPatrick GullaneChristopher GohJonathan C. IrishMelania PintilieR. Vriesendorp
- Topics
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies (8 papers)Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (5 papers)Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsFranceCanada
In The Last Decade
Hendrik P. Verschuur
24 papers receiving 432 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Otorhinolaryngology 249
- Surgery 152
- Neurology 101
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 96
- Sensory Systems 83
Countries citing papers authored by Hendrik P. Verschuur
This map shows the geographic impact of Hendrik P. Verschuur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hendrik P. Verschuur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hendrik P. Verschuur more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hendrik P. Verschuur
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hendrik P. Verschuur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hendrik P. Verschuur. The network helps show where Hendrik P. Verschuur may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hendrik P. Verschuur
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hendrik P. Verschuur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hendrik P. Verschuur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hendrik P. Verschuur. Hendrik P. Verschuur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 78 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | [Practice guideline 'Adenoid and tonsil disorders in secondary care']. | 2 |
| 6 | 101 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 91 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | [Acute mountain sickness and Menière disease]. | 2 |
About Hendrik P. Verschuur
Hendrik P. Verschuur is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing, having authored 25 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (8 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (5 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (249 citations), Sensory Systems (83 citations) and Neurology (101 citations). Hendrik P. Verschuur has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Paul G. van Benthem, Bas Pullens, Brian O’Sullivan, Patrick Gullane, Christopher Goh, Jonathan C. Irish, Melania Pintilie, R. Vriesendorp, Gerard A. Croll and Lorenz Moser. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Annals of Oncology and European Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.