Helen van Eyk
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Fran BaumToni Delany‐CroweColin MacDougallAngela LawlessCarmel WilliamsConnie MusolinoToby FreemanCatherine Hurley
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers)Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (8 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthBMC Public HealthThe Medical Journal of Australia
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Helen van Eyk
23 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- General Health Professions 232
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 131
- Economics and Econometrics 69
- Health 57
- Sociology and Political Science 34
Countries citing papers authored by Helen van Eyk
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen van Eyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen van Eyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen van Eyk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen van Eyk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen van Eyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen van Eyk. The network helps show where Helen van Eyk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen van Eyk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen van Eyk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen van Eyk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen van Eyk. Helen van Eyk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | SA: The Heaps Unfair State: Why have Health Inequities Increased in South Australia and How Can This Trend be Reversed? | 1 |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 81 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Caring for sick children: how working mothers cope | 1 |
About Helen van Eyk
Helen van Eyk is a scholar working on Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Health Professions, having authored 24 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (8 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (131 citations), General Health Professions (232 citations) and Health (57 citations). Helen van Eyk has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Fran Baum, Toni Delany‐Crowe, Colin MacDougall, Angela Lawless, Carmel Williams, Connie Musolino, Toby Freeman, Catherine Hurley, Joanne Flavel and Fisaha Haile Tesfay. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMC Public Health and The Medical Journal of Australia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.