Helen Pearson

28 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Helen Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
  • Family Practice 7
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Transplantation 6
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 6
Replace Kate Davies with:
Kate Davies United Kingdom
Amanda‐Jane Ramirez United Kingdom
Diane St. Germain United States
José Francisco Corona-Cruz Mexico
Cara Dooley Ireland
Tor Claudi Norway
Michelle Tallarico United States
Andrej Starc Slovenia
Pamela Landsman‐Blumberg United States
Leo Waterston United States
Helen Pearson relative to Kate Davies United Kingdom Kate Davies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kate Davies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Pearson. The network helps show where Helen Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Helen Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Helen Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201352
2 200741
3 201523
4 200619
5 202215
6 200114
7 201011
8 201510
9 202010
10 197010
11 200710
12 20118
13 20048
14 20056
15 20245
16 20253
17 20013
18 20063
19 20242
20 20212

About Helen Pearson

Helen Pearson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Reproductive Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 32 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers), Science, Research, and Medicine (4 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper) and Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations), Family Practice (7 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations), Transplantation (6 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (6 citations). Helen Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Faith Gibson, Anne‐Sophie Darlington, Declan Butler, Lynley V. Marshall, Gemma Bryan, Fernando Carceller, Richard Donnelly, James R. Bonham, Stergios Zacharoulis and Stuart J. Moat. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Issues in Science and Technology, Research Involvement and Engagement, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and BMC Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact