Helen Booler

465 citations
27 papers · 200 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 14
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 9
    • Retinal and Optic Conditions 3
    • Retinal Development and Disorders 7
    • Muscle Physiology and Disorders 4

Helen Booler

25 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers

Helen Booler
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Ophthalmology 96
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 61
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 7
  • Molecular Biology 102
  • Pharmaceutical Science 7
Replace Emma Lardner with:
Emma Lardner Sweden
Sofia M. Calado Portugal
Lawrence C. S. Tam Ireland
Christine N. Spencer United States
Peipei Zhang Germany
Sabine Hofmeister Germany
Magdalena Cortes Italy
G. A. Williams United Kingdom
Kevin I. Rosenberg United States
Helen Booler relative to Emma Lardner Sweden Emma Lardner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Emma Lardner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Booler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Booler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Booler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Booler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Booler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Booler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Booler. The network helps show where Helen Booler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Booler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Booler Line = papers co-authored together Helen Booler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201330
2 201921
3 201919
4 201716
5 201911
6 201511
7 201710
8 20199
9 20209
10 20208
11 20236
12 20216
13 20205
14 20085
15 20205
16 20165
17 20205
18 20234
19 20223
20 20213

About Helen Booler

Helen Booler is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology and Genetics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (14 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (9 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (7 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (4 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (4 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (2 papers) and Immunotoxicology and immune responses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (96 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (61 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (7 citations), Molecular Biology (102 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (7 citations). Helen Booler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vladimir Bantseev, S. Brown, Evan A. Thackaberry, Mark Hopkinson, Ellison Bentley, J.L.D. Williams, Giulio Barteselli, T. Michael Nork, Cindy Farman and Brian J. Christian. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicologic Pathology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Scientific Reports, Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact