Hege Bøen
About
In The Last Decade
Hege Bøen
5 papers receiving 325 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Clinical Psychology 143
- Health 136
- General Health Professions 116
- Social Psychology 68
- Sociology and Political Science 51
Countries citing papers authored by Hege Bøen
This map shows the geographic impact of Hege Bøen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hege Bøen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hege Bøen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hege Bøen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hege Bøen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hege Bøen. The network helps show where Hege Bøen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hege Bøen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hege Bøen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hege Bøen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hege Bøen. Hege Bøen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 224 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | Forebygging av depresjon med hovedvekt på individrettede metoder | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.