Heather Sampson

531 total citations
24 papers, 406 citations indexed

About

Heather Sampson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather Sampson has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 406 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Heather Sampson's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (6 papers). Heather Sampson is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (6 papers). Heather Sampson collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Heather Sampson's co-authors include Michael A.S. Jewett, David A. Greenberg, Jane Chan, Mark R. Gertner, Michael Robinette, John Tsihlias, Ricardo Rendon, John R. Kachura, Michael D. Sherar and John Trachtenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Neurology and The Journal of Urology.

In The Last Decade

Heather Sampson

23 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather Sampson Canada 8 186 167 79 61 53 24 406
Erica S. Tsang Canada 12 72 0.4× 86 0.5× 111 1.4× 33 0.5× 35 0.7× 54 509
Anne Jacobson United States 9 80 0.4× 97 0.6× 39 0.5× 22 0.4× 21 0.4× 32 349
Kelly McQuarrie United States 13 319 1.7× 45 0.3× 67 0.8× 34 0.6× 22 0.4× 33 634
Jamie Tan Australia 10 71 0.4× 214 1.3× 19 0.2× 62 1.0× 23 0.4× 12 464
J. S. Thompson United Kingdom 12 117 0.6× 61 0.4× 25 0.3× 78 1.3× 22 0.4× 25 566
М. И. Коган Russia 11 147 0.8× 140 0.8× 99 1.3× 24 0.4× 52 1.0× 183 593
Amy Gaviglio United States 11 92 0.5× 167 1.0× 38 0.5× 49 0.8× 56 1.1× 30 417
T. Cerny Switzerland 15 71 0.4× 71 0.4× 64 0.8× 55 0.9× 32 0.6× 23 406
N Gibbons United Kingdom 8 65 0.3× 102 0.6× 82 1.0× 23 0.4× 15 0.3× 13 356
L. Johnetta Blakely United States 11 156 0.8× 148 0.9× 21 0.3× 16 0.3× 75 1.4× 41 579

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Sampson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Sampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Sampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Sampson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Sampson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Sampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Sampson. The network helps show where Heather Sampson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather Sampson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather Sampson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather Sampson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather Sampson. Heather Sampson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Borrett, Donald S., Heather Sampson, & Ann Cavoukian. (2016). Research ethics by design: A collaborative research design proposal. Research Ethics. 13(2). 84–91. 5 indexed citations
2.
Willison, Donald J., Nancy Ondrusek, Angus Dawson, et al.. (2014). What makes public health studies ethical? Dissolving the boundary between research and practice. BMC Medical Ethics. 15(1). 61–61. 26 indexed citations
3.
Sampson, Heather, et al.. (2014). Resource development in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: An analysis on patient education resource development. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 43(1). 27–27. 4 indexed citations
4.
Anderson, James A., Michael McDonald, Daryl Pullman, et al.. (2011). Research Ethics Broadly Writ: Beyond REB Review. 19(3). 12. 10 indexed citations
5.
McDonald, Michael, et al.. (2011). Research Ethics in 2020: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. 19(3). 36. 3 indexed citations
6.
Owen, Michael, Claudia Emerson, Heather Sampson, et al.. (2009). Informing Governance through Evidence-Based Research on REBs: Challenges and Opportunities. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 17. 40. 1 indexed citations
7.
Sampson, Heather, Susan Cox, Raphael Saginur, & Michael Owen. (2009). Examining and Understanding the Need for Canadian Research Ethics Board (REB) Member Standardized Education: Governance Views from the Field. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 17. 73. 1 indexed citations
8.
Sampson, Heather, Charles Weijer, & Daryl Pullman. (2009). Research Governance Lessons from the National Placebo Initiative. Scholarship@Western (Western University). 17. 26. 3 indexed citations
9.
Saginur, Raphael, P. Deschamps, Michael Owen, & Heather Sampson. (2009). Ethics Review of Multi-Centre Trials: Where Do We Stand?. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 17. 59. 1 indexed citations
10.
Sampson, Heather, et al.. (2009). Assessment of barriers to patient participation in clinical trials among oncology outpatients at a community teaching hospital in Toronto. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 27(15_suppl). e17547–e17547. 1 indexed citations
12.
Angelos, Peter, et al.. (2006). Informed consent, capitation, and conflicts of interest in clinical trials: Views from the field. Surgery. 140(5). 740–748. 4 indexed citations
13.
Sampson, Heather. (2006). Introducing Student Nurses to Operating Department Nursing. Journal of Perioperative Practice. 16(2). 87–94. 2 indexed citations
14.
Rendon, Ricardo, John R. Kachura, Joan Sweet, et al.. (2002). The Uncertainty Of Radio Frequency Treatment Of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Findings At Immediate And Delayed Nephrectomy. The Journal of Urology. 1587–1592. 24 indexed citations
15.
Rendon, Ricardo, John R. Kachura, Joan Sweet, et al.. (2002). The Uncertainty Of Radio Frequency Treatment Of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Findings At Immediate And Delayed Nephrectomy. The Journal of Urology. 167(4). 1587–1592. 164 indexed citations
16.
Vaziri, S. A., Nicola Hughes, Heather Sampson, et al.. (2001). Variation in enzymes of arylamine procarcinogen biotransformation among bladder cancer patients and control subjects. Pharmacogenetics. 11(1). 7–20. 33 indexed citations
17.
Nam, Robert K., et al.. (2000). COMPARISON OF MOLECULAR AND CONVENTIONAL STRATEGIES FOR FOLLOWUP OF SUPERFICIAL BLADDER CANCER USING DECISION ANALYSIS. The Journal of Urology. 752–752. 1 indexed citations
18.
Nam, Robert K., Donald A. Redelmeier, Philippe E. Spiess, et al.. (2000). COMPARISON OF MOLECULAR AND CONVENTIONAL STRATEGIES FOR FOLLOWUP OF SUPERFICIAL BLADDER CANCER USING DECISION ANALYSIS. The Journal of Urology. 163(3). 752–757. 34 indexed citations
19.
Jewett, Michael A.S., Luc Valiquette, Heather Sampson, et al.. (1999). ELECTROMOTIVE DRUG ADMINISTRATION OF LIDOCAINE AS AN ALTERNATIVE ANESTHESIA FOR TRANSURETHRAL SURGERY. The Journal of Urology. 482–485. 1 indexed citations
20.
Greenberg, David A., Jane Chan, & Heather Sampson. (1992). Endothelins and the nervous system. Neurology. 42(1). 25–25. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026