Heather M. Roff

1.5k total citations
14 papers, 204 citations indexed

About

Heather M. Roff is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather M. Roff has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 204 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 5 papers in Safety Research and 5 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Heather M. Roff's work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers), International Law and Human Rights (4 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers). Heather M. Roff is often cited by papers focused on Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers), International Law and Human Rights (4 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers). Heather M. Roff collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Ireland. Heather M. Roff's co-authors include David Danks and Mary L. Cummings and has published in prestigious journals such as International Feminist Journal of Politics, Ethics & International Affairs and Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

In The Last Decade

Heather M. Roff

14 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather M. Roff United States 8 89 86 48 41 35 14 204
Frank Sauer Germany 9 73 0.8× 172 2.0× 92 1.9× 65 1.6× 28 0.8× 16 290
Rebecca Crootof United Kingdom 8 79 0.9× 67 0.8× 26 0.5× 25 0.6× 22 0.6× 21 174
Sabine Gleß Switzerland 6 50 0.6× 47 0.5× 28 0.6× 6 0.1× 22 0.6× 40 158
Daragh Murray United Kingdom 9 80 0.9× 72 0.8× 92 1.9× 4 0.1× 20 0.6× 22 240
Mihailis Diamantis United States 4 131 1.5× 27 0.3× 17 0.4× 6 0.1× 82 2.3× 10 221
Alexander Campolo United Kingdom 4 83 0.9× 6 0.1× 46 1.0× 6 0.1× 25 0.7× 7 184
Ildar Begishev Russia 9 77 0.9× 66 0.8× 18 0.4× 9 0.3× 66 253
Russell W. Glenn Australia 8 6 0.1× 83 1.0× 73 1.5× 7 0.2× 4 0.1× 43 193
Lisa M. Austin Canada 8 14 0.2× 24 0.3× 68 1.4× 4 0.1× 8 0.2× 39 169
Mark Leiser Netherlands 5 17 0.2× 27 0.3× 104 2.2× 4 0.1× 11 0.3× 22 172

Countries citing papers authored by Heather M. Roff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather M. Roff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather M. Roff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather M. Roff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather M. Roff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather M. Roff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather M. Roff. The network helps show where Heather M. Roff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather M. Roff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather M. Roff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather M. Roff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather M. Roff. Heather M. Roff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Roff, Heather M.. (2019). The frame problem: The AI “arms race” isn’t one. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 75(3). 95–98. 18 indexed citations
2.
Roff, Heather M.. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Power to the People. Ethics & International Affairs. 33(2). 127–140. 15 indexed citations
3.
Cummings, Mary L., et al.. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and International Affairs: Disruption Anticipated. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa). 15 indexed citations
4.
Roff, Heather M. & David Danks. (2018). “Trust but Verify”: The Difficulty of Trusting Autonomous Weapons Systems. Journal of Military Ethics. 17(1). 2–20. 37 indexed citations
5.
Roff, Heather M., et al.. (2017). Adiposity and the Role of Neuroendocrine Hormones in Energy Balance. AACN Advanced Critical Care. 28(3). 284–288. 3 indexed citations
6.
Roff, Heather M.. (2017). Advancing Human Security Through Artificial Intelligence. 5 indexed citations
7.
Roff, Heather M.. (2016). To ban or regulate autonomous weapons. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 72(2). 122–124. 2 indexed citations
8.
Roff, Heather M.. (2016). Gendering a Warbot. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 18(1). 1–18. 8 indexed citations
9.
Roff, Heather M.. (2015). Lethal Autonomous Weapons and Jus Ad Bellum Proportionality. Case Western Reserve journal of international law. 47(1). 37. 14 indexed citations
10.
Roff, Heather M.. (2015). Covert Actions and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect. 7(2). 167–189. 2 indexed citations
11.
Roff, Heather M.. (2015). The social critic and universal morality: a response to Finn. Global Discourse. 5(2). 297–303. 1 indexed citations
12.
Roff, Heather M.. (2014). The Strategic Robot Problem: Lethal Autonomous Weapons in War. Journal of Military Ethics. 13(3). 211–227. 63 indexed citations
13.
Roff, Heather M.. (2013). Global Justice, Kant and the Responsibility to Protect. 18 indexed citations
14.
Roff, Heather M.. (2009). Response to Pattison: Whose Responsibility to Protect?. Journal of Military Ethics. 8(1). 79–85. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026