Hazel Brooke
About
In The Last Decade
Hazel Brooke
4 papers receiving 363 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 351
- Pharmacy 169
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 136
- Emergency Medicine 102
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 53
Countries citing papers authored by Hazel Brooke
This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Brooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Brooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Brooke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel Brooke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Brooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Brooke. The network helps show where Hazel Brooke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hazel Brooke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hazel Brooke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hazel Brooke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hazel Brooke. Hazel Brooke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 148 | |
| 2 | 62 | |
| 3 | 155 | |
| 4 | 34 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.