Hassan Malik

5.1k total citations
81 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Hassan Malik is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Hepatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Hassan Malik has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Oncology, 43 papers in Surgery and 37 papers in Hepatology. Recurrent topics in Hassan Malik's work include Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (33 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (33 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (20 papers). Hassan Malik is often cited by papers focused on Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (33 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (33 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (20 papers). Hassan Malik collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and France. Hassan Malik's co-authors include Stephen W. Fenwick, Robert Jones, Aurélien Dupré, Graeme J. Poston, Declan F.J. Dunne, Rajendra Prasad, Giles J. Toogood, Neil R. Kitteringham, J. Peter A. Lodge and Dhanny Gomez and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Hassan Malik

74 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hassan Malik United Kingdom 24 958 739 667 502 335 81 1.8k
Stephen W. Fenwick United Kingdom 28 1.2k 1.2× 1.0k 1.4× 1.0k 1.5× 641 1.3× 169 0.5× 88 2.2k
Liping Chen China 16 518 0.5× 714 1.0× 371 0.6× 458 0.9× 342 1.0× 37 1.9k
Lee M. Ocuin United States 19 931 1.0× 678 0.9× 260 0.4× 482 1.0× 222 0.7× 119 1.9k
Davide Pastorelli Italy 19 496 0.5× 458 0.6× 723 1.1× 391 0.8× 298 0.9× 65 1.7k
Yao‐Li Chen Taiwan 23 315 0.3× 407 0.6× 479 0.7× 277 0.6× 419 1.3× 101 1.5k
S.M.M. Basso Italy 23 634 0.7× 842 1.1× 176 0.3× 355 0.7× 392 1.2× 106 2.0k
Morihiko Ishizaki Japan 24 385 0.4× 585 0.8× 776 1.2× 268 0.5× 157 0.5× 89 1.5k
Shohachi Suzuki Japan 24 416 0.4× 1.0k 1.4× 634 1.0× 411 0.8× 264 0.8× 99 1.8k
Thomas J. Ettrich Germany 24 1.1k 1.2× 576 0.8× 159 0.2× 730 1.5× 259 0.8× 146 1.8k
Noritoshi Kobayashi Japan 28 972 1.0× 1.1k 1.5× 392 0.6× 501 1.0× 314 0.9× 159 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Hassan Malik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hassan Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hassan Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hassan Malik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hassan Malik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hassan Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hassan Malik. The network helps show where Hassan Malik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hassan Malik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hassan Malik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hassan Malik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hassan Malik. Hassan Malik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wettstein, Dániel, Alberto Díaz García, Robert W. Young, et al.. (2025). Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Liver Resection in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Single Centre Propensity Score Matched Study. Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journal. 126(12). 3624–3631.
2.
Gilbert, Timothy, et al.. (2024). The importance of preclinical models in cholangiocarcinoma. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 51(2). 108304–108304. 2 indexed citations
3.
Gilbert, Timothy, et al.. (2024). Developing a patient-derived model of cholangiocarcinoma using Precision Cut Tissue Slices (PCTS).. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 50(2). 107758–107758. 1 indexed citations
5.
Haldenby, Sam, Anna Fowler, Katie Bullock, et al.. (2023). Genomic profiling of idiopathic peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma reveals new targets and mutational pathways. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 6681–6681. 5 indexed citations
6.
Rushbrook, Simon, Timothy J. Kendall, Yoh Zen, et al.. (2023). British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gut. 73(1). 16–46. 33 indexed citations
7.
Malik, Hassan, et al.. (2020). Hemobilia: secondary to microaneurysms of hepatic artery. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 70(0). 1–1. 1 indexed citations
9.
Dupré, Aurélien, Robert Jones, Rafael Díaz-Nieto, et al.. (2019). Preoperative Leucocyte‐Based Inflammatory Scores in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: Can We Count on Them?. World Journal of Surgery. 43(5). 1351–1359. 10 indexed citations
10.
Dupré, Aurélien, Robert Jones, Alex Parker, et al.. (2018). Validation of clinical prognostic scores for patients treated with curative‐intent for recurrent colorectal liver metastases. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 117(6). 1330–1336. 14 indexed citations
11.
Dupré, Aurélien & Hassan Malik. (2018). Inflammation and cancer: What a surgical oncologist should know. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 44(5). 566–570. 133 indexed citations
12.
Bird, N., Declan Dunne, Ben Francis, et al.. (2018). Role of a pre-operative radiological scoring system in determining resectability for potentially resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 45(2). 192–197. 4 indexed citations
13.
Dupré, Aurélien, Robert Jones, Rafael Díaz-Nieto, et al.. (2017). Curative-intent treatment of recurrent colorectal liver metastases: A comparison between ablation and resection. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 43(10). 1901–1907. 41 indexed citations
14.
Elmasry, Mohamed, et al.. (2016). The risk of malignancy in ultrasound detected gallbladder polyps: A systematic review. International Journal of Surgery. 33. 28–35. 88 indexed citations
15.
Stättner, Stefan, Florian Primavesi, Vincent Yip, et al.. (2014). Evolution of surgical microwave ablation for the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: review of the literature and a single centre experience. Surgery Today. 45(4). 407–415. 37 indexed citations
16.
Yip, Vincent, Dhanny Gomez, Sean Brown, et al.. (2013). Management of incidental and suspicious gallbladder cancer: focus on early referral to a tertiary centre. HPB. 16(7). 641–647. 26 indexed citations
17.
Jones, Robert, Neil R. Kitteringham, Monica Terlizzo, et al.. (2012). Microwave ablation ofex vivohuman liver and colorectal liver metastases with a novel 14.5 GHz generator. International Journal of Hyperthermia. 28(1). 43–54. 40 indexed citations
18.
Jones, Robert, Declan Dunne, Paul Sutton, et al.. (2012). Segmental and lobar administration of drug‐eluting beads delivering irinotecan leads to tumour destruction: a case–control series. HPB. 15(1). 71–77. 19 indexed citations
19.
Halazun, Karim J., Ahmed Al-Mukhtar, Amer Aldouri, et al.. (2007). Right Hepatic Trisectionectomy for Hepatobiliary Diseases. Annals of Surgery. 246(6). 1065–1074. 36 indexed citations
20.
Hilal, Mohammad Abu, et al.. (2006). What makes a good doctor in the 21st century? A qualitative study. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 67(7). 375–377. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026