Harsh Bhatia

35 papers receiving 818 citations

Peers

Harsh Bhatia
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 104
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 148
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 97
  • Biophysics 35
  • Computational Mechanics 121
Replace Scott B. Baden with:
Scott B. Baden United States
Michael Mascagni United States
Ingrid Hotz Germany
Mark A. Duchaineau United States
Aaron Knoll United States
Jan Westerholm Finland
Stanley Seibert United States
David M. Beazley United States
Julien Tierny France
Andreas Klöckner United States
Harsh Bhatia relative to Scott B. Baden United States Scott B. Baden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Scott B. Baden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Harsh Bhatia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Harsh Bhatia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harsh Bhatia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harsh Bhatia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Harsh Bhatia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harsh Bhatia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harsh Bhatia. The network helps show where Harsh Bhatia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Harsh Bhatia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Harsh Bhatia Line = papers co-authored together Harsh Bhatia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017206
2 2012167
3 202045
4 201939
5 201438
6 201830
7 201128
8 202124
9 201421
10 201118
11 201718
12 202018
13 201317
14 202316
15 201816
16 202115
17 201914
18 202213
19 201912
20 201410

About Harsh Bhatia

Harsh Bhatia is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 830 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (11 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (6 papers), Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (6 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (5 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (4 papers) and Cell Image Analysis Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (104 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (148 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (97 citations), Biophysics (35 citations) and Computational Mechanics (121 citations). Harsh Bhatia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovenia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Peer‐Timo Bremer, Valerio Pascucci, Helgi I. Ingólfsson, Felice C. Lightstone, Timothy S. Carpenter, ‪Siewert J. Marrink, Peter Lindström, Attila Gyulassy, Joshua A. Levine and Guoning Chen. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum, Computational Geometry, Nature Machine Intelligence and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact