Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and its Position in the Field of Social Research Methods
2010312 citationsHarrie JansenSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Harrie Jansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harrie Jansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harrie Jansen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harrie Jansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harrie Jansen. The network helps show where Harrie Jansen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harrie Jansen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harrie Jansen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harrie Jansen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Harrie Jansen. Harrie Jansen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Jansen, Harrie. (2013). La lógica de la investigación por encuesta cualitativa y su posición en el campo de los métodos de investigación social. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 5(1). 39–72.19 indexed citations
Jansen, Harrie. (2010). The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and its Position in the Field of Social Research Methods. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.312 indexed citations breakdown →
Jansen, Harrie & Anke Snoek. (2007). Masterprotocol resultaten scoren: handleiding voor de ontwikkeling van protocollen en kennisdocumenten voor de verslavingszorg.1 indexed citations
Jansen, Harrie & Tony Hak. (2005). The Productivity of the Three-Step Test-Interview (TSTI) Compared to an Expert Review of a Self-administered Questionnaire on Alcohol Consumption. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 21(1). 103–120.28 indexed citations
14.
Hak, Tony, Kees van der Veer, & Harrie Jansen. (2004). The Three-Step Test-Interview (TSTI): An observational instrument for pretesting self-completion questionnaires. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–35.29 indexed citations
Jansen, Harrie & Tony Hak. (2000). De kwaliteit van schriftelijke vragen over alcoholconsumptie: Vergelijking van een bureauonderzoek met een veldonderzoek. 47(3). 201–225.1 indexed citations
Jansen, Harrie. (1983). Klasse- en sekse-specificiteit in de waardering van conformiteit en zelfbepaling. Enkele ervaringen met de schaal van Kohn. Sociologische Gids. 30(1). 37–44.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.