Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Building Member Attachment in Online Communities: Applying Theories of Group Identity and Interpersonal Bonds1
2012441 citationsRen Ren, Harper et al.MIS Quarterlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harper. The network helps show where Harper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Harper. Harper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ren, Ren, et al.. (2012). Building Member Attachment in Online Communities: Applying Theories of Group Identity and Interpersonal Bonds1. MIS Quarterly. 36(3). 841–863.441 indexed citations breakdown →
Harper. (2012). Elements of rhetoric and literary criticism; with copious practical exercises and examples for the use of common schools and academies.1 indexed citations
Thompson, Nicola, et al.. (2009). Developing the English Uplands: A report to the Commission for Rural Communities' Inquiry into the Future for England's Upland Communities.1 indexed citations
7.
Harper, et al.. (2008). Disruptions in AUXl-Dependent Auxin Influx Alter Hypocotyl Phototropism in Arabidopsis. 分子植物:英文版. 1(1). 129–144.4 indexed citations
Xu, Chen, Rong Rong, et al.. (2006). The Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Hirnantian Stage (the uppermost of the Ordovician System). 29(3). 183–196.3 indexed citations
10.
Harper, et al.. (2006). Membrane bioreactor biomass characteristics and microbial yield at very low mean cell residence time.12 indexed citations
11.
Harper, et al.. (2005). Public Education in the City of New York: Its History, Condition, and Statistics: An Official Report to the Board of Education.
12.
Welsh, Deborah P., et al.. (2003). Dating and Sexual Relationship Trajectories and Adolescent Functioning. 3(3). 103–112.88 indexed citations
Moriarty, F., James L. Mays, & Harper. (1991). Harper's Bible Commentary. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 111(1). 186–186.25 indexed citations
Harper, EP Orringer, & Jerry C. Parker. (1979). Adriamycin inhibits Ca permeability and Ca-dependent K movements in red blood cells.. PubMed. 26(2). 277–84.4 indexed citations
20.
Harper, et al.. (1972). Diazepam in preeclamptic toxaemia with special reference to its effect on the newborn infant.. PubMed. 26(6). 271–5.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.