Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Fine Structure and Reproduction of Toxoplasma gondii
1968246 citationsHarley G. Sheffield, Marjorie L. MeltonJournal of Parasitologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Harley G. Sheffield
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Harley G. Sheffield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harley G. Sheffield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harley G. Sheffield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harley G. Sheffield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harley G. Sheffield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harley G. Sheffield. The network helps show where Harley G. Sheffield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harley G. Sheffield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harley G. Sheffield.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harley G. Sheffield based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Harley G. Sheffield. Harley G. Sheffield is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sheffield, Harley G. & R. Fayer. (1980). Fertilization in the coccidia: fusion of Sarcocystis bovicanis gametes.. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington. 47(1). 118–121.9 indexed citations
Sheffield, Harley G., Marjorie L. Melton, & F. A. Neva. (1976). Development of Hammondia hammondi in cell cultures.. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington. 43(2). 217–225.17 indexed citations
6.
Melton, Marjorie L. & Harley G. Sheffield. (1975). Activity of the anticoccidial compound, lasalocid, against Toxoplasma gondii in cultured cells.. Parasitology. 61(4). 713–717.2 indexed citations
Fayer, Ronald, Marjorie L. Melton, & Harley G. Sheffield. (1972). Quinine inhibition of host cell penetration by Toxoplasma gondii, Besnoitia jellisoni, and Sarcocystis sp. in vitro.. PubMed. 58(3). 595–9.6 indexed citations
10.
Sheffield, Harley G.. (1970). Schizogony in Toxoplasma gondii: an electron microscope study.. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington. 37(2).27 indexed citations
Sheffield, Harley G. & Marjorie L. Melton. (1968). The Fine Structure and Reproduction of Toxoplasma gondii. Journal of Parasitology. 54(2). 209–209.246 indexed citations breakdown →
Sheffield, Harley G.. (1962). Electron microscopy of the bacillary cells of Trichuris muris (Schrank, 1788).. Journal of Parasitology. 48.1 indexed citations
Worley, David E., et al.. (1960). Laboratory studies of the rodent whipworm, Trichuris muris (Schrank, 1788).. Journal of Parasitology. 46.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.