Hao Deng
Impact in
- Geophysics top 1%
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 2%
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Papers in
- Geophysics 58
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 58
- earthquake and tectonic studies 44
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 40
-
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis 11
Hao Deng
67 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Geophysics 2.1k
- Geochemistry and Petrology 251
- Artificial Intelligence 681
- Geology 91
- Paleontology 98
Countries citing papers authored by Hao Deng
This map shows the geographic impact of Hao Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hao Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hao Deng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hao Deng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hao Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hao Deng. The network helps show where Hao Deng may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hao Deng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 16 | N-MORB and IAT sources in the Proterozoic Miaowan Ophiolite Complex,Yangtze Craton: Evidence for evolving tectonic settings | 2016 | 1 |
| 17 | Insights into the tectonic evolution of the North China Craton through comparative tectonic analysis: A record of outward growth of Precambrian continents Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 342 |
| 18 | 2015 | 59 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 123 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 66 |
About Hao Deng
Hao Deng is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology, Geology, Paleontology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (58 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (44 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (40 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (12 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (11 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (3 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (3 papers) and Geochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (2.1k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (251 citations), Artificial Intelligence (681 citations), Geology (91 citations) and Paleontology (98 citations). Hao Deng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Kusky, Junpeng Wang, Ali Polat, Lu Wang, Songbai Peng, Songjie Wang, Xingfu Jiang, Hongtao Peng, Dong Fu and Wenbin Ning. Their work appears in journals such as Precambrian Research, Lithos, Geological Society of America Bulletin, Journal of Earth Science and Earth-Science Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.