Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions
1991499 citationsHans-Erik Nissen, Heinz K. Klein et al.Elsevier eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Hans-Erik Nissen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans-Erik Nissen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans-Erik Nissen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans-Erik Nissen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans-Erik Nissen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans-Erik Nissen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans-Erik Nissen. The network helps show where Hans-Erik Nissen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans-Erik Nissen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans-Erik Nissen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans-Erik Nissen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hans-Erik Nissen. Hans-Erik Nissen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nissen, Hans-Erik, Peter Bednár, & Christine Welch. (2007). Use and Redesign in IS: Double Helix Relationships?. Lund University Publications (Lund University).1 indexed citations
Nissen, Hans-Erik, et al.. (1991). Information systems research : contemporary approaches & emergent traditions : proceedings of the IFIP TC8/WG 8.2 Working Conference on the Information Systems Research Arena of the 90's Challenges, Perceptions, and Alternative Approaches : Copenhagen, Denmark, 14-16 December 1990. Elsevier eBooks.25 indexed citations
6.
Nissen, Hans-Erik, Heinz K. Klein, & Rudy Hirschheim. (1991). Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions. Elsevier eBooks. 14(3). 395–400.499 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Gillam, David, et al.. (1955). Accurate Determination of Thermal Conductivities.. Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry. 9. 641–656.17 indexed citations
8.
Virtanen, Artturi I., et al.. (1955). New alpha-Keto Acids in Green Plants. II. beta-Hydroxy- and gamma-Hydroxy-alpha-Ketobutyric Acids in Cowberries.. Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry. 9. 188–190.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.