Hannes Öhler

1.0k total citations
24 papers, 579 citations indexed

About

Hannes Öhler is a scholar working on Development, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannes Öhler has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 579 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Development, 15 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 12 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Hannes Öhler's work include International Development and Aid (22 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (12 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (11 papers). Hannes Öhler is often cited by papers focused on International Development and Aid (22 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (12 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (11 papers). Hannes Öhler collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Hannes Öhler's co-authors include Peter Nunnenkamp, Axel Dreher, Andreas Fuchs, Rainer Thiele, Željko Bogetić, Lodewijk Smets, Mario Negre, Christine Hackenesch and Paul Marschall and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, World Development and European Economic Review.

In The Last Decade

Hannes Öhler

24 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hannes Öhler Germany 14 373 301 229 115 74 24 579
Tobias Pfütze United States 11 280 0.8× 342 1.1× 163 0.7× 131 1.1× 103 1.4× 25 665
Ann‐Sofie Isaksson Sweden 10 259 0.7× 222 0.7× 166 0.7× 129 1.1× 115 1.6× 24 506
Simone Dietrich Switzerland 12 561 1.5× 515 1.7× 197 0.9× 81 0.7× 175 2.4× 29 782
Victoria Levin United States 10 219 0.6× 177 0.6× 149 0.7× 119 1.0× 42 0.6× 36 417
Javed Younas United Arab Emirates 12 268 0.7× 341 1.1× 100 0.4× 201 1.7× 52 0.7× 41 641
Peter Kragelund Denmark 13 343 0.9× 216 0.7× 87 0.4× 52 0.5× 94 1.3× 27 501
Gunilla Pettersson Gelander United States 6 172 0.5× 143 0.5× 75 0.3× 80 0.7× 49 0.7× 10 327
Catherine Gwin United Kingdom 9 192 0.5× 135 0.4× 61 0.3× 77 0.7× 76 1.0× 18 348
Tobias Heinrich United States 12 278 0.7× 356 1.2× 79 0.3× 222 1.9× 161 2.2× 30 629
Rachel M. Gisselquist Finland 13 79 0.2× 280 0.9× 60 0.3× 112 1.0× 118 1.6× 49 479

Countries citing papers authored by Hannes Öhler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannes Öhler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannes Öhler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannes Öhler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannes Öhler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannes Öhler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannes Öhler. The network helps show where Hannes Öhler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannes Öhler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannes Öhler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannes Öhler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannes Öhler. Hannes Öhler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hackenesch, Christine, et al.. (2022). Populist Radical Right Parties' Impact on European Foreign Aid Spending. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies. 60(5). 1391–1415. 10 indexed citations
2.
Fuchs, Andreas & Hannes Öhler. (2020). Does private aid follow the flag? An empirical analysis of humanitarian assistance. World Economy. 44(3). 671–705. 13 indexed citations
3.
Marschall, Paul, et al.. (2020). Bridging the gaps: An integrated approach to assessing aid effectiveness. Econstor (Econstor). 1 indexed citations
4.
Öhler, Hannes, et al.. (2019). Putting your money where your mouth is: Geographic targeting of World Bank projects to the bottom 40 percent. PLoS ONE. 14(6). e0218671–e0218671. 24 indexed citations
5.
Fuchs, Andreas & Hannes Öhler. (2019). Does Private Aid Follow the Flag? An Empirical Analysis of Humanitarian Assistance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
6.
Nunnenkamp, Peter, et al.. (2016). Need, Merit and Politics in Multilateral Aid Allocation: A District‐level Analysis of World Bank Projects in India. Review of Development Economics. 21(1). 126–156. 39 indexed citations
7.
Öhler, Hannes & Peter Nunnenkamp. (2014). Needs‐Based Targeting or Favoritism? The Regional Allocation of Multilateral Aid within Recipient Countries. Kyklos. 67(3). 420–446. 64 indexed citations
8.
Fuchs, Andreas, Peter Nunnenkamp, & Hannes Öhler. (2014). Why Donors of Foreign Aid Do Not Coordinate: The Role of Competition for Export Markets and Political Support. World Economy. 38(2). 255–285. 45 indexed citations
9.
Nunnenkamp, Peter, et al.. (2013). US based NGOs in International Development: Financial and Economic Determinants of Survival. World Development. 46. 45–65. 9 indexed citations
10.
Fuchs, Andreas, Peter Nunnenkamp, & Hannes Öhler. (2013). Why Donors of Foreign Aid Do Not Coordinate: The Role of Competition for Export Markets and Political Support. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
11.
Nunnenkamp, Peter, Hannes Öhler, & Rainer Thiele. (2013). Donor coordination and specialization: did the Paris Declaration make a difference?. Review of World Economics. 149(3). 537–563. 46 indexed citations
12.
Nunnenkamp, Peter & Hannes Öhler. (2012). Funding, Competition and the Efficiency of NGOs: An Empirical Analysis of Non‐charitable Expenditure of US NGOs Engaged in Foreign Aid. Kyklos. 65(1). 81–110. 26 indexed citations
13.
Dreher, Axel, et al.. (2012). Financial Dependence and Aid Allocation by Swiss NGOs: A Panel Tobit Analysis. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 60(4). 829–867. 22 indexed citations
14.
Nunnenkamp, Peter & Hannes Öhler. (2012). How to Attract Donations: The Case of US NGOs in International Development. The Journal of Development Studies. 48(10). 1522–1535. 16 indexed citations
15.
Öhler, Hannes, Peter Nunnenkamp, & Axel Dreher. (2011). Does conditionality work? A test for an innovative US aid scheme. European Economic Review. 56(1). 138–153. 60 indexed citations
16.
Dreher, Axel, Peter Nunnenkamp, & Hannes Öhler. (2011). Why it pays for aid recipients to take note of the Millennium Challenge Corporation: Other donors do!. Economics Letters. 115(3). 373–375. 40 indexed citations
17.
Dreher, Axel & Hannes Öhler. (2011). Does government ideology affect personal happiness? A test. Economics Letters. 111(2). 161–165. 15 indexed citations
18.
Nunnenkamp, Peter & Hannes Öhler. (2010). Funding, Competition and the Efficiency of NGOs: An Empirical Analysis of Non-Charitable Expenditure of US NGOs Engaged in Foreign Aid. SSRN Electronic Journal. 43 indexed citations
19.
Öhler, Hannes, Axel Dreher, & Peter Nunnenkamp. (2010). Does Conditionality Work? A Test for an Innovative US Aid Scheme. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations
20.
Nunnenkamp, Peter & Hannes Öhler. (2010). Aid Allocation through Various Official and Private Channels: Need, Merit, and Self-Interest as Motives of German Donors. World Development. 39(3). 308–323. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tobias Pfütze Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ann‐Sofie Isaksson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Simone Dietrich Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Victoria Levin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Javed Younas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter Kragelund Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gunilla Pettersson Gelander Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Catherine Gwin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tobias Heinrich Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel M. Gisselquist
Rankless by CCL
2026