Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker

727 citations
52 papers · 356 indexed · h-index 11
Topics
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (37 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (11 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers)

In The Last Decade

Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker

42 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Health 283
  • Clinical Psychology 155
  • Social Psychology 131
  • Sociology and Political Science 127
  • Pharmacology 41
Replace Peter J. Verhagen with:
Peter J. Verhagen Netherlands
Jared D. Kass United States
Brian H. McCorkle United States
Qijuan Fang United States
Michael E. Berrett United States
Randy K. Hardman United States
Yung Y. Chen United States
Sharon E. Cheston United States
Erica L. Birkley United States
Heidi Frølund Pedersen Denmark
Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker relative to Peter J. Verhagen Netherlands Peter J. Verhagen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Peter J. Verhagen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker. The network helps show where Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker. Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 0
4 1
5 1
6 2
7 5
8 4
9 3
10 2
11 2
12 5
13 17
14 17
15 11
16 6
17 16
18 43
19
Gereformeerde praktische theologie, een methodologische aanzet
1
20
Image of God and Personality
0

About Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker

Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker is a scholar working on Health, Religious studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (37 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (11 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (283 citations), Clinical Psychology (155 citations) and Social Psychology (131 citations). Hanneke Schaap‐Jonker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Arjan W. Braam, Jozef Corveleyn, Elisabeth H.M. Eurelings-Bontekoe, Peter J. Verhagen, Hetty Zock, Aartjan T.F. Beekman, Bram Sizoo, Koen Luyckx, Jessie Dezutter and Arndt Büssing. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026