Hannah Riley
About
In The Last Decade
Hannah Riley
2 papers receiving 86 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Social Psychology 63
- Clinical Psychology 57
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 22
- Applied Psychology 18
- Education 16
Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Riley
This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Riley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Riley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Riley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Riley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Riley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Riley. The network helps show where Hannah Riley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Riley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Riley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Riley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Riley. Hannah Riley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparison of salaries of medical specialists: Australia and New Zealand | 1 |
| 2 | 99 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.