Hannah M. Mathers
- Plant Science top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Soil Science top 10%
- Pollution
- Global and Planetary Change
- Co-authors
- Daniel StruveThomas H. YeagerCarolyn F. ScagelStephen ChandlerImed DamiWarren A. DickT.E. BilderbackGary J. Kling
- Topics
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (9 papers)Seedling growth and survival studies (7 papers)Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- DiabetesWeed ScienceHortScience
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Hannah M. Mathers
24 papers receiving 304 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Plant Science 246
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 96
- Soil Science 94
- Pollution 38
- Global and Planetary Change 30
Countries citing papers authored by Hannah M. Mathers
This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah M. Mathers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah M. Mathers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah M. Mathers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah M. Mathers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah M. Mathers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah M. Mathers. The network helps show where Hannah M. Mathers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah M. Mathers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah M. Mathers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah M. Mathers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah M. Mathers. Hannah M. Mathers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 53 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | Retracting Statements: Tree Liner Production in Retractable-Roof Greenhouses (RRGs) | 0 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Screening Malus seedlings for cold resistance | 2 |
About Hannah M. Mathers
Hannah M. Mathers is a scholar working on Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (9 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (7 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (94 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (96 citations) and Plant Science (246 citations). Hannah M. Mathers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Struve, Thomas H. Yeager, Carolyn F. Scagel, Stephen Chandler, Imed Dami, Warren A. Dick, T.E. Bilderback, Gary J. Kling, Jeffrey R. Harris and Linjian Jiang. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes, Weed Science and HortScience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.