Haneen Deeb

402 total citations
38 papers, 290 citations indexed

About

Haneen Deeb is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Haneen Deeb has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 290 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Social Psychology, 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Haneen Deeb's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (37 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (20 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (13 papers). Haneen Deeb is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (37 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (20 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (13 papers). Haneen Deeb collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Haneen Deeb's co-authors include Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal, Samantha Mann, Ronald P. Fisher, Lorraine Hope, Pär Anders Granhag, Leif A. Strömwall, Louise Jupe, Eunkyung Jo and Majeed Khader and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Acta Psychologica and Applied Cognitive Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Haneen Deeb

32 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Haneen Deeb United Kingdom 11 273 147 130 112 95 38 290
Louise Jupe United Kingdom 9 204 0.7× 83 0.6× 108 0.8× 96 0.9× 80 0.8× 16 240
Kevin Colwell United States 11 378 1.4× 185 1.3× 271 2.1× 139 1.2× 139 1.5× 24 454
Glynis Bogaard Netherlands 11 299 1.1× 118 0.8× 163 1.3× 137 1.2× 99 1.0× 27 339
Jackie Hillman United Kingdom 12 399 1.5× 166 1.1× 277 2.1× 160 1.4× 96 1.0× 15 419
Cheryl Hiscock‐Anisman United States 9 230 0.8× 116 0.8× 139 1.1× 81 0.7× 85 0.9× 13 244
Evelyne Debey Netherlands 8 241 0.9× 152 1.0× 130 1.0× 91 0.8× 43 0.5× 8 281
Jennifer T. Perillo United States 4 143 0.5× 58 0.4× 92 0.7× 69 0.6× 29 0.3× 8 175
Jessica K. Swanner United States 6 130 0.5× 67 0.5× 65 0.5× 52 0.5× 12 0.1× 8 155
Simon Oleszkiewicz Sweden 11 241 0.9× 123 0.8× 64 0.5× 152 1.4× 26 0.3× 19 263
George Visu‐Petra Romania 7 150 0.5× 80 0.5× 107 0.8× 49 0.4× 52 0.5× 12 204

Countries citing papers authored by Haneen Deeb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Haneen Deeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haneen Deeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haneen Deeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Haneen Deeb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haneen Deeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haneen Deeb. The network helps show where Haneen Deeb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Haneen Deeb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Haneen Deeb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Haneen Deeb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Haneen Deeb. Haneen Deeb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vrij, Aldert, Sharon Leal, Haneen Deeb, & Ronald P. Fisher. (2025). Omission Lies: The Effect of Omitting Little or Much Information on Verbal Veracity Cues. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(1). 25–37. 1 indexed citations
2.
Vrij, Aldert, et al.. (2025). The Effect of the Interviewer’s Cognitive Load on the Quality of the Forensic Interview. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(2). 101–110.
3.
Deeb, Haneen, et al.. (2024). Veracity Judgments Based on Complications: A Training Experiment. Behavioral Sciences. 14(9). 839–839.
4.
Deeb, Haneen, et al.. (2024). Exposing Suspects to Their Sketches in Repeated Interviews to Elicit Information and Veracity Cues. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(1). 1–15. 2 indexed citations
5.
6.
Deeb, Haneen, et al.. (2024). To Nod or Not to Nod: How Does Interviewer Nonverbal Behavior Affect Rapport Perceptions and Recall in Truth Tellers and Lie Tellers?. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 48(1). 25–45. 1 indexed citations
7.
Leal, Sharon, Aldert Vrij, Haneen Deeb, & Ronald P. Fisher. (2024). Verbal cues in omission lies: The effect of informing sources about the essential part of the event. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 38(4). 1 indexed citations
8.
Deeb, Haneen, et al.. (2024). Honesty repeats itself: comparing manual and automated coding on the veracity cues total details and redundancy. Applied Psycholinguistics. 45(5). 934–962. 1 indexed citations
9.
Leal, Sharon, et al.. (2023). Verbal Cues to Deceit when Lying through Omitting Information: Examining the Effect of a Model Statement Interview Protocol. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15(1). 1–8. 11 indexed citations
10.
Leal, Sharon, et al.. (2023). Combining the Devil’s Advocate Approach and Verifiability Approach to Assess Veracity in Opinion Statements. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15(2). 53–61. 3 indexed citations
11.
Mann, Samantha, Aldert Vrij, Haneen Deeb, & Sharon Leal. (2023). All mouth and trousers? Use of the Devil’s Advocate questioning protocol to determine authenticity of opinions about protester actions. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 1–23. 2 indexed citations
12.
Vrij, Aldert, et al.. (2023). Verbal Veracity Indicators and the Efficacy of Countermeasures in Three Non-WEIRD Populations. 5(1). p34–p34. 1 indexed citations
13.
Deeb, Haneen, Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal, et al.. (2022). Sketching routes to elicit information and cues to deceit. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 36(5). 1049–1059. 7 indexed citations
14.
Deeb, Haneen, Aldert Vrij, & Sharon Leal. (2020). The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews. Acta Psychologica. 207. 103080–103080. 12 indexed citations
15.
Harvey, Adam Charles, Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal, et al.. (2020). Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality. Acta Psychologica. 209. 103130–103130. 2 indexed citations
16.
Deeb, Haneen, et al.. (2020). The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews. Acta Psychologica. 213. 103236–103236. 9 indexed citations
17.
Mann, Samantha, et al.. (2019). Detecting smugglers: Identifying strategies and behaviours in individuals in possession of illicit objects. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34(2). 372–386. 8 indexed citations
18.
Vrij, Aldert, et al.. (2019). Lying about flying: The efficacy of the information protocol and model statement for detecting deceit. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34(1). 241–255. 13 indexed citations
19.
Leal, Sharon, Aldert Vrij, Haneen Deeb, & Louise Jupe. (2018). Using the model statement to elicit verbal differences between truth tellers and liars: The benefit of examining core and peripheral details.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 7(4). 610–617. 24 indexed citations
20.
Deeb, Haneen, Pär Anders Granhag, Aldert Vrij, et al.. (2018). Visuospatial counter‐interrogation strategies by liars familiar with the alibi setting. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 32(1). 105–116. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Louise Jupe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kevin Colwell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Glynis Bogaard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jackie Hillman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cheryl Hiscock‐Anisman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Evelyne Debey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer T. Perillo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jessica K. Swanner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Simon Oleszkiewicz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by George Visu‐Petra
Rankless by CCL
2026