Hanabeth Luke

474 total citations
26 papers, 340 citations indexed

About

Hanabeth Luke is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Sociology and Political Science and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Hanabeth Luke has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 340 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Building and Construction, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Hanabeth Luke's work include Mining and Resource Management (10 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (4 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (4 papers). Hanabeth Luke is often cited by papers focused on Mining and Resource Management (10 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (4 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (4 papers). Hanabeth Luke collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Hanabeth Luke's co-authors include David Lloyd, Martin Brueckner, Richard Parsons, William Boyd, Darrick Evensen, Dennys Eduardo Rossetto, Jacques Demajorovic, Elisabet Dueholm Rasch, Betty Weiler and Andrew P. Colefax and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Environmental Management, Land Use Policy and Resources Policy.

In The Last Decade

Hanabeth Luke

23 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hanabeth Luke Australia 11 142 96 67 53 39 26 340
Sarah Holcombe Australia 12 226 1.6× 139 1.4× 50 0.7× 58 1.1× 55 1.4× 56 529
Juha Kotilainen Finland 12 148 1.0× 119 1.2× 134 2.0× 38 0.7× 23 0.6× 25 434
Laura Aileen Sauls United States 11 79 0.6× 79 0.8× 165 2.5× 41 0.8× 60 1.5× 18 357
Kate J. Neville Canada 12 49 0.3× 112 1.2× 132 2.0× 36 0.7× 42 1.1× 23 462
James S. Gruber United States 10 57 0.4× 89 0.9× 140 2.1× 59 1.1× 32 0.8× 12 389
Janette Bulkan Canada 11 80 0.6× 52 0.5× 164 2.4× 12 0.2× 28 0.7× 44 330
Stephan Schott Canada 12 92 0.6× 155 1.6× 87 1.3× 81 1.5× 81 2.1× 31 496
Herman Rosa United States 5 74 0.5× 77 0.8× 216 3.2× 43 0.8× 49 1.3× 8 379
Beatriz Bustos Chile 12 103 0.7× 93 1.0× 83 1.2× 41 0.8× 52 1.3× 27 411
Ksenija Hanaček Spain 8 45 0.3× 99 1.0× 108 1.6× 38 0.7× 22 0.6× 11 306

Countries citing papers authored by Hanabeth Luke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hanabeth Luke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hanabeth Luke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hanabeth Luke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hanabeth Luke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hanabeth Luke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hanabeth Luke. The network helps show where Hanabeth Luke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hanabeth Luke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hanabeth Luke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hanabeth Luke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hanabeth Luke. Hanabeth Luke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wechtler, Heidi, et al.. (2025). Is climate risk perception enough? Empirical evidence from Australian farmers. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 133. 105918–105918.
3.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2024). Is human activity driving climate change? Perspectives from Australian landholders. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8. 1 indexed citations
4.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2024). Regenerative agriculture in Australia: the changing face of farming. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8. 5 indexed citations
5.
Benkendorff, Kirsten, et al.. (2023). The nutritional composition of Australian native grains used by First Nations people and their re-emergence for human health and sustainable food systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7. 9 indexed citations
6.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2023). Regenerative farming as climate action. Journal of Environmental Management. 347. 119063–119063. 12 indexed citations
7.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2022). Exploring opportunities and constraints of a certification scheme for regenerative agricultural practice. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 46(10). 1527–1549. 10 indexed citations
8.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2021). A mining legacies lens: from externalities to wellbeing in extractive industries. The Extractive Industries and Society. 8(3). 100961–100961. 4 indexed citations
9.
Luke, Hanabeth & Darrick Evensen. (2021). After the dust settles: Community resilience legacies of unconventional gas development. The Extractive Industries and Society. 8(3). 100856–100856. 5 indexed citations
10.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2020). Agriculture on the Eyre Peninsula: Rural Landholder Social Benchmarking Report. Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO). 5 indexed citations
11.
Parsons, Richard & Hanabeth Luke. (2020). Comparing reflexive and assertive approaches to social licence and social impact assessment. The Extractive Industries and Society. 8(2). 100765–100765. 21 indexed citations
12.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2019). ‘All dressed up with nowhere to go’: Navigating the coal seam gas boom in the Western Downs region of Queensland. The Extractive Industries and Society. 6(4). 1350–1361. 14 indexed citations
13.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2018). Is ‘activist’ a dirty word? Place identity, activism and unconventional gas development across three continents. The Extractive Industries and Society. 5(4). 524–534. 27 indexed citations
15.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2018). Unconventional gas development in Australia: A critical review of its social license. The Extractive Industries and Society. 5(4). 648–662. 35 indexed citations
16.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2017). Ecological restoration of a severely degraded coastal acid sulfate soil: A case study of the East Trinity wetland, Queensland. Ecological Management & Restoration. 18(2). 103–114. 16 indexed citations
17.
Luke, Hanabeth. (2016). Social license for industrial developments in rural areas : a case study of unconventional gas development in the Northern Rivers, Australia ; an investigation of regional values, identity and social dynamics. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 2 indexed citations
18.
Lloyd, David, et al.. (2014). Improving Conservation Community Group Effectiveness Using Mind Mapping and Action Research. Conservation and Society. 12(1). 43–43. 14 indexed citations
19.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2014). Unconventional Gas Development: Why a Regional Community Said No. Geographical Research. 52(3). 263–279. 24 indexed citations
20.
Luke, Hanabeth, et al.. (2013). Developing the Lismore CSG Poll – A University/Local Government Collaboration. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 15(3). 119. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026