Han Yang

770 citations
49 papers · 516 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Han Yang

42 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers

Han Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Rehabilitation 35
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35
  • Global and Planetary Change 87
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 41
  • Finance 27
Replace Lichao Yang with:
Lichao Yang China
Jessica Crowe United States
Phil Healey New Zealand
Mohammad Nurul Azam Malaysia
Katherine Brookfield United Kingdom
Guillaume Marchand France
Clemens Breisinger United States
Han Yang relative to Lichao Yang China Lichao Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Lichao Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Han Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Han Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Han Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Han Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Han Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Han Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Han Yang. The network helps show where Han Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Han Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Han Yang Line = papers co-authored together Han Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202066
2 202055
3 202253
4 202042
5 202236
6 202029
7 202226
8 202223
9 202420
10 202320
11 199217
12 202312
13 201911
14 202410
15 202210
16 20228
17 20236
18 20245
19 20225
20 20225

About Han Yang

Han Yang is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change and Epidemiology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (3 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (35 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (35 citations), Global and Planetary Change (87 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (41 citations) and Finance (27 citations). Han Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Xuefeng Li, Jin Jia, Hui Wang, Jiaqi Liu, Xiaonan Zhao, Yen‐Chiang Chang, Hui Wang, Minyan Li, Xujun Liu and Feng Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact