Hamish T. J. Gilbert
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Judith A. HoylandStephen M. RichardsonS.J. Millward‐SadlerJoe SwiftNathan HodsonPauline BairdAndrew P. DoveAnthony J. Freemont
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers)Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryNature Communications
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Hamish T. J. Gilbert
17 papers receiving 680 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 231
- Molecular Biology 203
- Pharmacology 172
- Biomedical Engineering 137
- Physiology 129
Countries citing papers authored by Hamish T. J. Gilbert
This map shows the geographic impact of Hamish T. J. Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hamish T. J. Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hamish T. J. Gilbert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hamish T. J. Gilbert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hamish T. J. Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hamish T. J. Gilbert. The network helps show where Hamish T. J. Gilbert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hamish T. J. Gilbert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hamish T. J. Gilbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hamish T. J. Gilbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hamish T. J. Gilbert. Hamish T. J. Gilbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 127 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 41 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 115 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 57 |
About Hamish T. J. Gilbert
Hamish T. J. Gilbert is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (231 citations), Pharmacology (172 citations) and Cell Biology (121 citations). Hamish T. J. Gilbert has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Judith A. Hoyland, Stephen M. Richardson, S.J. Millward‐Sadler, Joe Swift, Nathan Hodson, Pauline Baird, Andrew P. Dove, Anthony J. Freemont, Matthew P. Ablett and Oana Dobre. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.