Halley Pierce
About
In The Last Decade
Halley Pierce
9 papers receiving 998 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Hematology 592
- Immunology 350
- Molecular Biology 265
- Genetics 257
- Oncology 152
Countries citing papers authored by Halley Pierce
This map shows the geographic impact of Halley Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Halley Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Halley Pierce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Halley Pierce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Halley Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Halley Pierce. The network helps show where Halley Pierce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Halley Pierce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Halley Pierce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Halley Pierce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Halley Pierce. Halley Pierce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 267 | |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | 324 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 276 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.