Haleh Charif
About
In The Last Decade
Haleh Charif
6 papers receiving 446 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Parasitology 435
- Epidemiology 330
- Virology 95
- Molecular Biology 51
- Ecology 51
Countries citing papers authored by Haleh Charif
This map shows the geographic impact of Haleh Charif's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haleh Charif with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haleh Charif more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Haleh Charif
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haleh Charif. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haleh Charif. The network helps show where Haleh Charif may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Haleh Charif
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Haleh Charif. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Haleh Charif based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Haleh Charif. Haleh Charif is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47 | |
| 2 | 111 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 160 | |
| 5 | 92 | |
| 6 | 21 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.