Hala Nassereddine
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hala Nassereddine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hala Nassereddine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hala Nassereddine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hala Nassereddine. Hala Nassereddine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hala Nassereddine
43 papers receiving 309 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Hala Nassereddine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hala Nassereddine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hala Nassereddine. The network helps show where Hala Nassereddine may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Hala Nassereddine
This map shows the geographic impact of Hala Nassereddine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hala Nassereddine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hala Nassereddine more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.