Haikong Lu

31 total papers · 493 total citations
21 papers, 380 citations indexed

About

Haikong Lu is a scholar working on Physiology, Microbiology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Haikong Lu has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 380 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Physiology, 13 papers in Microbiology and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Haikong Lu's work include Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (18 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (13 papers) and Sex work and related issues (5 papers). Haikong Lu is often cited by papers focused on Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (18 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (13 papers) and Sex work and related issues (5 papers). Haikong Lu collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and Poland. Haikong Lu's co-authors include Pingyu Zhou, Zhifang Guan, Xin Gu, Cuini Wang, Mei Shi, Kang Li, Yuanyuan Wang, Kang Li, Qianqiu Wang and Myron S. Cohen and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, Scientific Reports and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Haikong Lu

19 papers receiving 368 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Haikong Lu	315	253	63	60	56	21	380
Zhifang Guan	329 1.0×	253 1.0×	76 1.2×	56 0.9×	56 1.0×	22	406
Mei Shi	216 0.7×	164 0.6×	51 0.8×	38 0.6×	41 0.7×	28	341
Shelia B. Dunaway	208 0.7×	164 0.6×	63 1.0×	26 0.4×	76 1.4×	12	347
Tara B. Reid	336 1.1×	257 1.0×	60 1.0×	83 1.4×	34 0.6×	11	412
Wujian Ke	215 0.7×	209 0.8×	37 0.6×	37 0.6×	44 0.8×	41	384
Jacinta Azevedo	235 0.7×	302 1.2×	39 0.6×	59 1.0×	31 0.6×	20	394
E. Prieto	221 0.7×	219 0.9×	80 1.3×	55 0.9×	15 0.3×	24	335
Kai-Hua Chi	260 0.8×	204 0.8×	55 0.9×	55 0.9×	13 0.2×	20	353
Janet Knox	111 0.4×	228 0.9×	44 0.7×	37 0.6×	53 0.9×	16	387
Yang Yang	186 0.6×	193 0.8×	40 0.6×	40 0.7×	81 1.4×	19	359

Countries citing papers authored by Haikong Lu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Haikong Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haikong Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haikong Lu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Haikong Lu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haikong Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haikong Lu. The network helps show where Haikong Lu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Haikong Lu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Haikong Lu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Haikong Lu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Haikong Lu. Haikong Lu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact