Haifeng Lang

672 citations
12 papers · 525 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Haifeng Lang

12 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

Haifeng Lang
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Materials Chemistry 350
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 176
  • Condensed Matter Physics 30
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 41
  • Artificial Intelligence 74
Replace Tomas Polakovic with:
Tomas Polakovic United States
Xuanmin Zhu China
Lingling Wen China
M. Grado-Caffaro Spain
Marcin Kurpas Poland
Edris Faizabadi Iran
Bertúlio de Lima Bernardo Brazil
Edo van Veen Netherlands
Kenneth MacLean United States
Haifeng Lang relative to Tomas Polakovic United States Tomas Polakovic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Tomas Polakovic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Haifeng Lang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Haifeng Lang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haifeng Lang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haifeng Lang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Haifeng Lang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haifeng Lang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haifeng Lang. The network helps show where Haifeng Lang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Haifeng Lang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Haifeng Lang Line = papers co-authored together Haifeng Lang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2016272
2 201797
3 202161
4 202242
5 201822
6 202211
7 20217
8 20237
9 20212
10 20242
11 20241
12 20201

About Haifeng Lang

Haifeng Lang is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Materials Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Pharmacy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers), Quantum many-body systems (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (3 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers), MXene and MAX Phase Materials (2 papers), Graphene research and applications (2 papers) and 2D Materials and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (350 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (176 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (30 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (41 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (74 citations). Haifeng Lang has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Shuqing Zhang, Zhirong Liu, Philipp Hauke, Jad C. Halimeh, Zhenzhu Li, Ting Cheng, Zhongfan Liu, Jiang Zhang, Yi-Xin Chen and Heng Fan. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physics Letters A, Quantum Information Processing and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact