Hai‐Feng Ji
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 2%
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas ThundatGilbert M. BrownXiaohe XuReza DabestaniJoshua B. SmithDaniel HagamanKarolyn M. HansenGuanghua Wu
- Topics
- Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (51 papers)Mechanical and Optical Resonators (49 papers)Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (39 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyAdvanced Materials
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaIran
In The Last Decade
Hai‐Feng Ji
216 papers receiving 5.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.8k
- Materials Chemistry 1.6k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.4k
- Biomedical Engineering 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 930
Countries citing papers authored by Hai‐Feng Ji
This map shows the geographic impact of Hai‐Feng Ji's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hai‐Feng Ji with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hai‐Feng Ji more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hai‐Feng Ji
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hai‐Feng Ji. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hai‐Feng Ji. The network helps show where Hai‐Feng Ji may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hai‐Feng Ji
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hai‐Feng Ji. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hai‐Feng Ji based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hai‐Feng Ji. Hai‐Feng Ji is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Hai‐Feng Ji
Hai‐Feng Ji is a scholar working on Bioengineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy, having authored 224 papers that have together received 5.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (51 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (49 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (39 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (831 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.4k citations) and Spectroscopy (605 citations). Hai‐Feng Ji has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Thundat, Gilbert M. Brown, Xiaohe Xu, Reza Dabestani, Joshua B. Smith, Daniel Hagaman, Karolyn M. Hansen, Guanghua Wu, Arun Majumdar and Rick Cote. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Advanced Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.