Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms
19873.9k citationsIlkka Kuorinka, Björn Jonsson et al.Applied Ergonomicsprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of H Vinterberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H Vinterberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H Vinterberg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H Vinterberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H Vinterberg. The network helps show where H Vinterberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H Vinterberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H Vinterberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H Vinterberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H Vinterberg. H Vinterberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Duer‐Jensen, Anne, Merete Lund Hetland, Kim Hørslev‐Petersen, et al.. (2011). Reply. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 64(1). 322–323.1 indexed citations
4.
Asmussen, Karsten, et al.. (1997). [Lumbar disk prolapse surgery with or without free fat transplantation. A prospective triple-blind randomized study].. PubMed. 159(14). 2091–5.2 indexed citations
Manniche, Claus, et al.. (1994). Back pain, sciatica and disability following first-time conventional haemilaminectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Use of "Low Back Pain Rating Scale" as a postal questionnaire.. PubMed. 41(1). 103–6.18 indexed citations
Manniche, Claus, et al.. (1994). Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Finneson's and modified Spengler's score systems.. PubMed. 41(1). 110–5.33 indexed citations
Nielsen, Anni Brit Sternhagen, et al.. (1990). [Psychological stress before, during and after hospitalization for low back disease. Patients' experience illustrated by qualitative interviews].. PubMed. 152(16). 1151–6.1 indexed citations
14.
Kuorinka, Ilkka, Björn Jonsson, Åsa Kilbom, et al.. (1987). Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Applied Ergonomics. 18(3). 233–237.3897 indexed citations breakdown →
Andersson, Gerhard, Fin Biering‐Sørensen, L. Hermansen, et al.. (1984). [Scandinavian questionnaires regarding occupational musculo-skeletal disorders].. PubMed. 99(2). 54–5.7 indexed citations
18.
Vinterberg, H, et al.. (1978). [Transcutaneous nerve-stimulation for relief of pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].. PubMed. 140(20). 1149–50.4 indexed citations
19.
Andersen, Johan A., H Vinterberg, Lockhart B. McGuire, et al.. (1974). Contents, Vol. 59, 1974. Cardiology. 59(6). I–IV.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.