H Thiele
- Surgery top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Gerhard SchülerIngo EitelGilles ChâtellierA. LafontG. SchülerRichard W. SmallingIngo DaehnertMichael A. Borger
- Topics
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers)Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (5 papers)Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
H Thiele
15 papers receiving 429 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Surgery 332
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 293
- Biomedical Engineering 277
- Emergency Medicine 124
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 74
Countries citing papers authored by H Thiele
This map shows the geographic impact of H Thiele's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H Thiele with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H Thiele more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H Thiele
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H Thiele. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H Thiele. The network helps show where H Thiele may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H Thiele
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H Thiele. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H Thiele based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H Thiele. H Thiele is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 69 | |
| 8 | 132 | |
| 9 | 150 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | [Ulcus cruris venosum]. | 3 |
| 15 | [Initial experience with endoscopic subfascial dissection of perforating veins in 100 interventions]. | 8 |
| 16 | [Cross-section gastroenterostomy. An alternative to conventional side-to-side gastroenterostomy]. | 2 |
| 17 | [Vaginal rupture with prolapse of the small intestine]. | 2 |
About H Thiele
H Thiele is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Surgery, having authored 17 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (5 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (293 citations), Emergency Medicine (124 citations) and Surgery (332 citations). H Thiele has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Schüler, Ingo Eitel, Gilles Châtellier, A. Lafont, G. Schüler, Richard W. Smalling, Ingo Daehnert, Michael A. Borger, Georg Fuernau and Matthias Gutberlet. Their work appears in journals such as European Heart Journal, Heart and Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.