H. R. Schmidt

13.5k total citations
17 papers, 123 citations indexed

About

H. R. Schmidt is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, H. R. Schmidt has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 123 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 3 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in H. R. Schmidt's work include Particle Detector Development and Performance (9 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (5 papers). H. R. Schmidt is often cited by papers focused on Particle Detector Development and Performance (9 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (5 papers). H. R. Schmidt collaborates with scholars based in Germany, India and Saudi Arabia. H. R. Schmidt's co-authors include Gerhard Wagner, P. Grabmayr, Bruno Burger, C. Schmidt, J. Hehner, S. Biswas, U. Frankenfeld, T. Morhardt, V. Kleipa and C. Garabatos and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

H. R. Schmidt

16 papers receiving 119 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
H. R. Schmidt Germany 7 78 43 36 31 18 17 123
Stefano Cleva Italy 5 14 0.2× 56 1.3× 20 0.6× 7 0.2× 14 0.8× 14 81
H. Burckhart Switzerland 8 137 1.8× 21 0.5× 46 1.3× 5 0.2× 9 0.5× 22 166
Tomasz Kozak Poland 4 12 0.2× 39 0.9× 8 0.2× 16 0.5× 12 0.7× 27 64
Alexey Lokhov Russia 6 22 0.3× 20 0.5× 11 0.3× 7 0.2× 37 2.1× 17 137
N. Kazeev Russia 5 26 0.3× 32 0.7× 8 0.2× 8 0.3× 2 0.1× 18 118
R.W. Goodwin United States 6 34 0.4× 35 0.8× 20 0.6× 3 0.1× 21 1.2× 23 101
P. Zotto Italy 6 63 0.8× 48 1.1× 80 2.2× 4 0.1× 4 0.2× 31 143
M. Volpi Australia 5 38 0.5× 45 1.0× 17 0.5× 23 1.3× 26 96
H. Duarte France 8 107 1.4× 60 1.4× 114 3.2× 2 0.1× 5 0.3× 15 239
S.G. Zverev Russia 6 18 0.2× 34 0.8× 9 0.3× 3 0.1× 38 2.1× 16 84

Countries citing papers authored by H. R. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. R. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. R. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. R. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. R. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. R. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. R. Schmidt. The network helps show where H. R. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. R. Schmidt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. R. Schmidt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. R. Schmidt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. R. Schmidt. H. R. Schmidt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Fèvre, A. Le, M. Colonna, G. Verde, et al.. (2023). Long range plans to study the nuclear equation-of-state from sub- to supra-saturation densities with heavy-ion collisions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 290. 10004–10004.
2.
Kapishin, M., et al.. (2022). Feasibility studies of strangeness production in heavy-ion interactions at the BM@N experiment using Monte Carlo simulations. Physica Scripta. 97(8). 84003–84003. 1 indexed citations
3.
Frankenfeld, U., C. Garabatos, J. Hehner, et al.. (2020). Spark probability measurement of a single mask triple GEM detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 977. 164334–164334. 2 indexed citations
4.
Schmidt, H. R., et al.. (2019). Advanced methods for the optical quality assurance of silicon sensors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 922. 336–344. 6 indexed citations
5.
Schmidt, H. R.. (2018). The silicon tracking system of the CBM experiment at FAIR. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 936. 630–633. 5 indexed citations
6.
Schmidt, H. R., et al.. (2016). A Custom Probe Station for Microstrip Detector Quality Assurance of the CBM Experiment. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 742. 12037–12037. 4 indexed citations
7.
Biswas, S., U. Frankenfeld, C. Garabatos, et al.. (2015). Measurement of the spark probability of a GEM detector for the CBM muon chamber (MuCh). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 800. 93–97. 5 indexed citations
8.
Biswas, S., U. Frankenfeld, C. Garabatos, et al.. (2015). Systematic measurements of the gain and the energy resolution of single and double mask GEM detectors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 824. 504–506. 5 indexed citations
9.
Dubey, A. K., S. Chattopadhyay, J. Saini, et al.. (2014). Testing of triple-GEM chambers for CBM experiment at FAIR using self-triggered readout electronics. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 755. 62–68. 8 indexed citations
10.
Biswas, S., U. Frankenfeld, C. Garabatos, et al.. (2013). Development of a GEM based detector for the CBM Muon Chamber (MUCH). Journal of Instrumentation. 8(12). C12002–C12002. 10 indexed citations
11.
Biswas, S., U. Frankenfeld, J. Hehner, et al.. (2012). Study of the characteristics of GEM detectors for the future FAIR experiment CBM. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 718. 403–405. 9 indexed citations
12.
Biswas, S., et al.. (2012). Study of the Influence of Construction Materials on the Ageing Properties of High Rate Gas Detectors. Physics Procedia. 37. 442–447. 1 indexed citations
13.
Jorgensen, A. M., et al.. (2011). Interferometric Imaging of Geostationary Satellites: Signal-to-Noise Considerations. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference. 2 indexed citations
14.
Burger, Bruno, et al.. (2010). Light and Shadow – When is MPP-Tracking at the Module Level Worthwhile?. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 3932–3936. 6 indexed citations
15.
Schmidt, H. R., et al.. (2009). How Fast Does an MPP Tracker Really Need To Be?. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 3273–3276. 28 indexed citations
16.
Schmidt, H. R. & H.H. Gutbrod. (1989). Highly Relativistic Heavy-Ion Experiments at CERN. CERN Bulletin. 216. 51. 1 indexed citations
17.
Wagner, Gerhard, P. Grabmayr, & H. R. Schmidt. (1982). An implicit folding procedure for isoscalar transition rates. Physics Letters B. 113(6). 447–450. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026