H. L. Ginsberg
- Archeology top 5%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Language and Linguistics
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Franz RosenthalMichael FishbaneStephen A. KaufmanElias BickermanHenry S. GehmanSolomon ZeitlinN. WalkerWalther Zimmerli
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (10 papers)Archaeology and Historical Studies (6 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical LiteratureJournal of the American Oriental SocietyBulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
H. L. Ginsberg
13 papers receiving 34 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Archeology 45
- Religious studies 42
- Sociology and Political Science 29
- Language and Linguistics 11
- Political Science and International Relations 6
Countries citing papers authored by H. L. Ginsberg
This map shows the geographic impact of H. L. Ginsberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. L. Ginsberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. L. Ginsberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. L. Ginsberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. L. Ginsberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. L. Ginsberg. The network helps show where H. L. Ginsberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. L. Ginsberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. L. Ginsberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. L. Ginsberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. L. Ginsberg. H. L. Ginsberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | The book of Isaiah : a new translation | 0 |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About H. L. Ginsberg
H. L. Ginsberg is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Development, having authored 20 papers that have together received 69 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (10 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (6 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (42 citations), Archeology (45 citations) and Language and Linguistics (11 citations). H. L. Ginsberg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Franz Rosenthal, Michael Fishbane, Stephen A. Kaufman, Elias Bickerman, Henry S. Gehman, Solomon Zeitlin, N. Walker, Walther Zimmerli, Elmar Edel and Gerhard von Rad. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Journal of the American Oriental Society and Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.