H. J. Korsch
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 0.5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 0.2%
- Spectroscopy top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Dirk WitthautEva-Maria GraefeS MossmannFrédéric KeckAndrey R. KolovskyReinhard SchinkeMarkus GlückF. Trimborn
- Topics
- Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (81 papers)Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (77 papers)Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (33 papers)
In The Last Decade
H. J. Korsch
159 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3.0k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.5k
- Spectroscopy 367
- Artificial Intelligence 358
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 151
Countries citing papers authored by H. J. Korsch
This map shows the geographic impact of H. J. Korsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. J. Korsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. J. Korsch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. J. Korsch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. J. Korsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. J. Korsch. The network helps show where H. J. Korsch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. J. Korsch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. J. Korsch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. J. Korsch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. J. Korsch. H. J. Korsch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 151 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | Analytical study of resonant transport of Bose-Einstein condensates (12 pages) | 1 |
| 4 | 43 | |
| 5 | 188 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 70 | |
| 17 | 105 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About H. J. Korsch
H. J. Korsch is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy, having authored 160 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (81 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (77 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.5k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3.0k citations) and Spectroscopy (367 citations). H. J. Korsch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Dirk Witthaut, Eva-Maria Graefe, S Mossmann, Frédéric Keck, Andrey R. Kolovsky, Reinhard Schinke, Markus Glück, F. Trimborn, Astrid Elisa Niederle and R. S. Kaushal. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.