Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Factors of patellar instability: An anatomic radiographic study
19941.4k citationsH Dejour, Gilles Walch et al.Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopyprofile →
Tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two radiological tests compared
This map shows the geographic impact of H Dejour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H Dejour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H Dejour more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H Dejour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H Dejour. The network helps show where H Dejour may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H Dejour
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H Dejour.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H Dejour based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H Dejour. H Dejour is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dejour, H, Gilles Walch, G. Deschamps, & Pierre Chambat. (2014). Arthrosis of the knee in chronic anterior laxity. Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research. 100(1). 49–58.22 indexed citations
Walch, Gilles, Pascal Boileau, É. Noël, J.-P. Liotard, & H Dejour. (1991). [Surgical treatment of painful shoulders caused by lesions of the rotator cuff and biceps, treatment as a function of lesions. Reflections on the Neer's concept].. PubMed. 58(4). 247–57.19 indexed citations
Bonnin, M., et al.. (1990). [Total hip prosthesis in coxarthrosis following congenital hip dislocation (65 hips reviewed at 5 years)].. PubMed. 56(1 Pt B). 387–93.2 indexed citations
12.
Dejour, H & Philippe Neyret. (1989). [What should be done in a meniscal lesion?].. PubMed. 39(28). 2497–502.2 indexed citations
13.
Gilly, F.N., et al.. (1989). [Perforation of the cervical esophagus and hypopharynx complicating surgery by an anterior approach to the cervical spine].. PubMed. 43(5). 343–7.13 indexed citations
14.
Banssillon, V., et al.. (1987). [Prevention of deep venous thrombosis in orthopedic surgery for total hip prosthesis. Randomized trial for determining optimal dosage].. PubMed. 41(5). 377–85.5 indexed citations
15.
Lejeune, E, et al.. (1979). [Osteoid osteoma of the foot. Apropos of 4 personal cases].. PubMed. 46(12). 711–7.1 indexed citations
16.
Dejour, H, et al.. (1976). [Unicondylar fractures of the femur].. PubMed. 61(7). 611–26.7 indexed citations
17.
Dejour, H, et al.. (1975). Ostéome-ostéoïde du fond du cotyle. 61(8).5 indexed citations
18.
Dejour, H. (1972). Laxités post-traumatiques du genou. Les laxités anciennes. Physiopathologie des laxités chroniques du genou.. 58.2 indexed citations
19.
Dejour, H. (1972). [Posttraumatic laxity of the knee. Long-standing laxity. Physiopathology of chronic laxity of the knee].. PubMed. 58. Suppl 1:61–70.2 indexed citations
20.
Vignon, G, et al.. (1970). [Tibial osteotomy in gonarthrosis].. PubMed. 19(3). 114–24.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.