H. Bart van der Worp

2.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
19 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

H. Bart van der Worp is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Bart van der Worp has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 13 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 11 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in H. Bart van der Worp's work include Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (19 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (13 papers) and Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (11 papers). H. Bart van der Worp is often cited by papers focused on Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (19 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (13 papers) and Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (11 papers). H. Bart van der Worp collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Switzerland. H. Bart van der Worp's co-authors include Leo H. Bonati, Gert J. de Borst, Philippe Lyrer, Roland L. Featherstone, Paul Dorman, Joanna Dobson, Sumaira Macdonald, P.A. Gaines, Paul J. Nederkoorn and Martin M. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Neurology.

In The Last Decade

H. Bart van der Worp

19 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial

2010 833 citations Joanna Dobson, Roland L. Featherstone et al. The Lancet profile →
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial

2014 359 citations Leo H. Bonati, Joanna Dobson et al. The Lancet profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
H. Bart van der Worp Netherlands	15	1.6k	1.2k	852	828	196	19	1.7k
Jörg Ederle United Kingdom	10	975 0.6×	733 0.6×	520 0.6×	432 0.5×	125 0.6×	12	1.0k
John H. Wong Canada	21	670 0.4×	248 0.2×	347 0.4×	1.1k 1.3×	156 0.8×	57	1.4k
Ming W. Liu United States	18	1.3k 0.8×	860 0.7×	726 0.9×	746 0.9×	96 0.5×	40	1.6k
Giuseppe Da Giau Italy	22	1.1k 0.7×	578 0.5×	402 0.5×	533 0.6×	99 0.5×	53	1.2k
J.M. de Bray France	15	613 0.4×	318 0.3×	340 0.4×	432 0.5×	70 0.4×	36	850
Beverly Aagaard‐Kienitz United States	14	961 0.6×	116 0.1×	793 0.9×	864 1.0×	96 0.5×	31	1.2k
William Morrish Canada	13	540 0.3×	227 0.2×	401 0.5×	395 0.5×	66 0.3×	24	709
Kiyoshi Kazekawa Japan	20	560 0.3×	133 0.1×	299 0.4×	857 1.0×	138 0.7×	111	1.1k
Daina Kashiwazaki Japan	19	436 0.3×	130 0.1×	169 0.2×	721 0.9×	425 2.2×	101	1.0k
Mariusz Trystuła Poland	14	508 0.3×	297 0.3×	249 0.3×	197 0.2×	36 0.2×	65	661

Countries citing papers authored by H. Bart van der Worp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Bart van der Worp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Bart van der Worp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Bart van der Worp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Bart van der Worp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Bart van der Worp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Bart van der Worp. The network helps show where H. Bart van der Worp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Bart van der Worp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Bart van der Worp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Bart van der Worp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Bart van der Worp. H. Bart van der Worp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Müller, Mandy D., John Gregson, Dominick J. H. McCabe, et al.. (2019). Stent Design, Restenosis and Recurrent Stroke After Carotid Artery Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study. Stroke. 50(11). 3013–3020. 32 indexed citations

Müller, Mandy D., Lisa M. Jongen, Kristine A. Blackham, et al.. (2019). Silent Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients Randomized to Stenting or Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. Journal of Stroke. 21(1). 116–119. 2 indexed citations

Müller, Mandy D., F. Ahlhelm, Alexander von Hessling, et al.. (2017). Vascular Anatomy Predicts the Risk of Cerebral Ischemia in Patients Randomized to Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy. Stroke. 48(5). 1285–1292. 50 indexed citations

Gensicke, Henrik, H. Bart van der Worp, Paul J. Nederkoorn, et al.. (2015). Ischemic Brain Lesions After Carotid Artery Stenting Increase Future Cerebrovascular Risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 65(6). 521–529. 86 indexed citations

Hendrikse, Jeroen, Ale Algra, Martin M. Brown, et al.. (2014). Ipsilateral foetal-type posterior cerebral artery is associated with cognitive decline after carotid revascularisation. BMC Neurology. 14(1). 84–84. 5 indexed citations

Bonati, Leo H., Joanna Dobson, Roland L. Featherstone, et al.. (2014). Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial. The Lancet. 385(9967). 529–538. 359 indexed citations breakdown →

Reichmann, B.L., Willem E. Hellings, H. Bart van der Worp, et al.. (2013). Flow Velocities in the External Carotid Artery Following Carotid Revascularization. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 46(4). 411–417. 16 indexed citations

Zandvoort, M.J.E. van, Esther van den Berg, Ale Algra, et al.. (2013). The effect of white matter lesions on cognition after carotid revascularization. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 334(1-2). 77–82. 10 indexed citations

Ederle, Jörg, Indran Davagnanam, H. Bart van der Worp, et al.. (2013). Effect of white-matter lesions on the risk of periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS): a prespecified analysis of data from a randomised trial. The Lancet Neurology. 12(9). 866–872. 39 indexed citations

10.

Algra, Ale, Leo H. Bonati, Martin M. Brown, et al.. (2013). Periprocedural Hemodynamic Depression Is Associated With a Higher Number of New Ischemic Brain Lesions After Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study-MRI Substudy. Stroke. 45(1). 146–151. 39 indexed citations

11.

Algra, Ale, Martin M. Brown, Roland L. Featherstone, et al.. (2013). Effects of Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting on Hemodynamic Complications in the International Carotid Stenting Study: A Randomized Comparison. International Journal of Stroke. 9(3). 284–290. 29 indexed citations

12.

Gensicke, Henrik, Thomas Zumbrunn, Lisa M. Jongen, et al.. (2012). Characteristics of Ischemic Brain Lesions After Stenting or Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis. Stroke. 44(1). 80–86. 44 indexed citations

13.

Zandvoort, M.J.E. van, Esther van den Berg, Lisa M. Jongen, et al.. (2011). Cognition after carotid endarterectomy or stenting. Neurology. 77(11). 1084–1090. 64 indexed citations

14.

Algra, Ale, Martin M. Brown, Roland L. Featherstone, et al.. (2011). Effects of Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting on Blood Pressure in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Stroke. 42(12). 3491–3496. 16 indexed citations

15.

Dobson, Joanna, Roland L. Featherstone, Leo H. Bonati, et al.. (2010). Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 375(9719). 985–997. 833 indexed citations breakdown →

16.

Jongen, Lisa M., H. Bart van der Worp, Annet Waaijer, Y. van der Graaf, & Willem P.Th.M. Mali. (2010). Interrelation between the Degree of Carotid Stenosis, Collateral Circulation and Cerebral Perfusion. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 30(3). 277–284. 37 indexed citations

17.

Jongen, Lisa M., Jeroen Hendrikse, Frans L. Moll, Willem P.T.M. Mali, & H. Bart van der Worp. (2010). Cerebral Perfusion Affects the Risk of Ischemia during Carotid Artery Stenting. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 29(6). 538–545. 19 indexed citations

18.

Jongen, Lisa M., Jeroen Hendrikse, Annet Waaijer, et al.. (2009). Frequency and Consequences of Early In-stent Lesions after Carotid Artery Stent Placement. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 20(5). 573–579. 7 indexed citations

19.

Jongen, Lisa M., et al.. (2009). Incidental Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients With Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis. Stroke. 40(4). 1341–1346. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact