Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of G.W. Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.W. Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.W. Gee more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.W. Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.W. Gee. The network helps show where G.W. Gee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.W. Gee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.W. Gee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.W. Gee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G.W. Gee. G.W. Gee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gee, G.W., et al.. (2004). Chloride-mass-balance for predicting increased recharge after land-use change. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).5 indexed citations
3.
Albright, William H., et al.. (2003). Examining the Alternatives. Civil engineering. 73(5). 70–75.15 indexed citations
Velde, Marijn van der, G.W. Gee, & Steve Green. (2003). After fire comes rain: drainage in Tonga. DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven). 1–2.2 indexed citations
6.
Gee, G.W., et al.. (2002). Particle Size Analysis. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 255–293.1394 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
DePaolo, Donald J., Mark E. Conrad, Kate Maher, & G.W. Gee. (2002). Evaporation effects on O and H isotopes in deep vadose zone pore fluids at Hanford, Washington: Implications for recharge and horizontal fluid movement. Vadose Zone Journal. 3.2 indexed citations
Murray, Chris, et al.. (2001). The Effects of Clastic Dikes on Vadose Zone Transport at the Hanford Site, Southcentral Washington. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 82(47).2 indexed citations
10.
Ward, Anderson L., et al.. (2001). The effect of fluid properties on field-scale anion transport during intermittent unsaturated flow. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 82(47).1 indexed citations
Wierenga, P. J., et al.. (1986). Validation of stochastic flow and transport models for unsaturated soils: a comprehensive field study. Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America. 20(1). 58.12 indexed citations
16.
Gee, G.W., et al.. (1984). Field lysimeter facility for evaluating the performance of commercial solidified low-level waste. Unknow.1 indexed citations
17.
Gee, G.W., et al.. (1982). Symposium on unsaturated flow and transport modeling. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).3 indexed citations
Gee, G.W.. (1966). Water movement in soils as influenced by temperature gradients. University Microfilms eBooks.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.