Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Standing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Standing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Standing more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Standing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Standing. The network helps show where Guy Standing may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guy Standing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guy Standing.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guy Standing based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Guy Standing. Guy Standing is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Standing, Guy. (2017). Basic Income: And How We Can Make It Happen. Penguin eBooks.67 indexed citations
4.
Standing, Guy. (2016). El precariado y la lucha de clases. 87–102.2 indexed citations
5.
Standing, Guy. (2015). Basic income: A transformative policy for India. SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London).25 indexed citations
6.
Standing, Guy. (2014). Conditionality and human rights. SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London).4 indexed citations
7.
Standing, Guy. (2013). Why zero-hours contracts remind me of the horrors of 1990s Russia. SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London).2 indexed citations
8.
Jhabvala, Renana & Guy Standing. (2010). Targeting to the 'Poor': Clogged Pipes and Bureaucratic Blinkers. Economic and political weekly. 45. 239–246.10 indexed citations
9.
Standing, Guy. (2009). Work after Globalization. Books.5 indexed citations
10.
Standing, Guy. (2007). Conditional Cash Transfers: Why Targeting and Conditionalities Could Fail. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
11.
Standing, Guy. (2004). Minimum Income Schemes in Europe.14 indexed citations
12.
Standing, Guy & Mary C. Daly. (2001). Care work: The quest for security.104 indexed citations
13.
Standing, Guy & Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead. (1995). Minimum wages in Central and Eastern Europe : from protection to destitution. Central European University Press eBooks.22 indexed citations
14.
Standing, Guy. (1990). El camino hacia el subsidio activo: ¿otra forma de protección social o amenaza para la ocupación?. Revista Internacional del Trabajo. 109(4). 499–516.1 indexed citations
15.
Standing, Guy. (1987). La flexibilidad laboral: ¿causa o remedio del desempleo?. 43–80.1 indexed citations
16.
Standing, Guy. (1987). Konsep-konsep mobilitas di negara sedang berkembang.1 indexed citations
Standing, Guy, et al.. (1978). Labour force participation in low-income countries.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.