Günter Stein
About
In The Last Decade
Günter Stein
8 papers receiving 677 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Nephrology 442
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 206
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 150
- Surgery 141
- Nutrition and Dietetics 85
Countries citing papers authored by Günter Stein
This map shows the geographic impact of Günter Stein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Günter Stein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Günter Stein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Günter Stein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Günter Stein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Günter Stein. The network helps show where Günter Stein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Günter Stein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Günter Stein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Günter Stein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Günter Stein. Günter Stein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 56 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 477 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 65 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 23 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.