Countries citing papers authored by Guillermo Macbeth
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Guillermo Macbeth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guillermo Macbeth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guillermo Macbeth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guillermo Macbeth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guillermo Macbeth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guillermo Macbeth. The network helps show where Guillermo Macbeth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guillermo Macbeth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guillermo Macbeth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guillermo Macbeth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Guillermo Macbeth. Guillermo Macbeth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Macbeth, Guillermo, et al.. (2018). Perspectiva de tiempo futuro, metas y sub-metas: su rol en la toma de decisiones. Conicet. 10(2). 3.1 indexed citations
3.
Macbeth, Guillermo, et al.. (2015). Prior Affirmative Representation Facilitates the Cognitive Processing of Compound Negation. Conicet. 5(6). 205–215.4 indexed citations
4.
Macbeth, Guillermo, et al.. (2014). Eficacia de monitoreo metacognitivo en procesos de atribución de verdad, falsedad y novedad. 27(43). 63–76.1 indexed citations
Razumiejczyk, Eugenia, et al.. (2013). El efecto de priming y sus variantes experimentales. 7(18).3 indexed citations
7.
Razumiejczyk, Eugenia, et al.. (2013). Evidencia Funcional y Neuroanatómica del Procesamiento del Efecto Priming de Repetición. 5(15).1 indexed citations
8.
Razumiejczyk, Eugenia, et al.. (2012). Interferencia stroop intermodal entre representaciones gustativas y auditivas. Conicet. 5(2). 25–41.2 indexed citations
Macbeth, Guillermo, et al.. (2011). El modelo frontoestriado del trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo: evidencia convergente de estudios de potenciales evocados relacionados a eventos. 10(25).1 indexed citations
Macbeth, Guillermo, et al.. (2010). Correlación entre autoestima y calibración en tareas de razonamiento abstracto. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 3(2). 48–61.1 indexed citations
Razumiejczyk, Eugenia, et al.. (2008). Evidencia de priming gustativo y su disociación con la memoria explícita. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(2). 549–556.6 indexed citations
Razumiejczyk, Eugenia, et al.. (2008). La vinculación entre las modalidades gustativa y olfativa en el reconocimiento del sabor.. 18(18). 5–12.2 indexed citations
17.
Macbeth, Guillermo & Eugenia Razumiejczyk. (2008). Disolución del sesgo de subconfianza en tareas verbales. Anales de Psicología. 24(1). 143–149.7 indexed citations
18.
Macbeth, Guillermo, et al.. (2008). La medición de los sesgos de la confianza mediante modelos discretos y continuos. 117–134.2 indexed citations
19.
Macbeth, Guillermo, et al.. (2007). Construction of a mathematic test for adolescents and adults. Interdisciplinaria Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines. 24(1). 43–64.2 indexed citations
20.
Macbeth, Guillermo, et al.. (2006). La Investigación Científica en Psicología: un Desarrollo Históricoo. 5(15).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.