Guillaume Chollet
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 2%
- Polymers and Plastics top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Henri CramailÉtienne GrauAnne‐Laure WirotiusEmmanuelle SchulzLise MaisonneuveStéphane GrelierFrédérique Ham-PichavantDenilson da Silva Perez
- Topics
- biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (10 papers)Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (9 papers)Polymer composites and self-healing (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCarbohydrate PolymersGreen Chemistry
In The Last Decade
Guillaume Chollet
22 papers receiving 614 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Biomaterials 284
- Process Chemistry and Technology 264
- Polymers and Plastics 258
- Organic Chemistry 207
- Biomedical Engineering 142
Countries citing papers authored by Guillaume Chollet
This map shows the geographic impact of Guillaume Chollet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guillaume Chollet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guillaume Chollet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guillaume Chollet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guillaume Chollet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guillaume Chollet. The network helps show where Guillaume Chollet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guillaume Chollet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guillaume Chollet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guillaume Chollet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guillaume Chollet. Guillaume Chollet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 107 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Guillaume Chollet
Guillaume Chollet is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Biomaterials and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (10 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (9 papers) and Polymer composites and self-healing (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (264 citations), Biomaterials (284 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (258 citations). Guillaume Chollet has collaborated with scholars based in France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Henri Cramail, Étienne Grau, Anne‐Laure Wirotius, Emmanuelle Schulz, Lise Maisonneuve, Stéphane Grelier, Frédérique Ham-Pichavant, Denilson da Silva Perez, Michel Petit‐Conil and Alois Fürstner. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Carbohydrate Polymers and Green Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.