Guangwei Geng

402 citations
15 papers · 352 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Guangwei Geng

14 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Guangwei Geng
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Electrochemistry 63
  • Bioengineering 31
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 87
  • Polymers and Plastics 46
  • Materials Chemistry 145
Replace Xiaodan Liu with:
Xiaodan Liu China
Harsha Devnani India
Anjaiah Sheelam United States
Hao Gou China
R. E. Azooz Saudi Arabia
Justina Gaidukevič Lithuania
Olimpia Arias de Fuentes Cuba
Palanisamy Rupa Kasturi India
Mailis Lounasvuori Germany
Srikanth Ponnada India
Guangwei Geng relative to Xiaodan Liu China Xiaodan Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Xiaodan Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guangwei Geng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guangwei Geng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guangwei Geng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guangwei Geng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guangwei Geng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guangwei Geng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guangwei Geng. The network helps show where Guangwei Geng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guangwei Geng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guangwei Geng Line = papers co-authored together Guangwei Geng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201797
2 201770
3 201535
4 201932
5 201731
6 202021
7 201515
8 201613
9 201813
10 20167
11 20176
12 20226
13 20243
14 20252
15 20221

About Guangwei Geng

Guangwei Geng is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (5 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (3 papers), Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (3 papers), Copper-based nanomaterials and applications (3 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (2 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (2 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (2 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (63 citations), Bioengineering (31 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (87 citations), Polymers and Plastics (46 citations) and Materials Chemistry (145 citations). Guangwei Geng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yuanchao Li, Minghua Liu, Penglei Chen, Changchun Yang, Bo Guan, Yuping Zhang, Wanqing Zhang, Nannan Wang, Yu Liu and Baojun Li. Their work appears in journals such as RSC Advances, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, ACS Nano, Electrochimica Acta and Journal of the Energy Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact