Guang‐Ping Shen

473 total citations
10 papers, 368 citations indexed

About

Guang‐Ping Shen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Guang‐Ping Shen has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 368 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Pharmacology and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Guang‐Ping Shen's work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers). Guang‐Ping Shen is often cited by papers focused on DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers). Guang‐Ping Shen collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Guang‐Ping Shen's co-authors include Susan S. Wallace, Scott D. Kathe, Girja S. Shukla, David N. Krag, Susan P. Fuller, Donald L. Weaver, Taka Ashikaga, Christian Thomas, Susan Burdette-Radoux and Stephanie C. Pero and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Cancer Research and Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Guang‐Ping Shen

9 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Guang‐Ping Shen

MB

RNMI

ECOLO

CR

ONCOL

Bahman Akbari Iran

Julia Coronella United States

Simone Junqua France

Marie‐France Counis France

Stefania Spada Switzerland

Xiaoling Liang China

Gavin Teo Singapore

Daniela Spalletti-Cernia Italy

Jennifer Clark United States

Claire Marty‐Detraves France

Bahman Akbari Iran

Guang‐Ping Shen

206 ×0.7

MB

140 ×1.3

RNMI

73 ×1.3

ECOLO

21 ×0.5

CR

64 ×1.7

ONCOL

Citations per year, relative to Guang‐Ping Shen Guang‐Ping Shen (= 1×) peers Bahman Akbari

Countries citing papers authored by Guang‐Ping Shen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guang‐Ping Shen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guang‐Ping Shen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guang‐Ping Shen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guang‐Ping Shen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guang‐Ping Shen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guang‐Ping Shen. The network helps show where Guang‐Ping Shen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guang‐Ping Shen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guang‐Ping Shen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guang‐Ping Shen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guang‐Ping Shen. Guang‐Ping Shen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Shukla, Girja S., et al.. (2007). Towards a ligand targeted enzyme prodrug therapy: Single round panning of a β‐lactamase scaffold library on human cancer cells. International Journal of Cancer. 120(10). 2233–2242. 5 indexed citations

2.

Krag, David N., Girja S. Shukla, Guang‐Ping Shen, et al.. (2006). Selection of Tumor-binding Ligands in Cancer Patients with Phage Display Libraries. Cancer Research. 66(15). 7724–7733. 165 indexed citations

3.

Kathe, Scott D., Guang‐Ping Shen, & Susan S. Wallace. (2004). Single-Stranded Breaks in DNA but Not Oxidative DNA Base Damages Block Transcriptional Elongation by RNA Polymerase II in HeLa Cell Nuclear Extracts. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279(18). 18511–18520. 127 indexed citations

4.

Kathe, Scott D., Guang‐Ping Shen, & Susan S. Wallace. (2004). Single-stranded breaks in DNA but not oxidative DNA base damages block transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II in HeLa cell nuclear extracts. Vol. 279 (2004) 18511-18520. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279(26). 27830–27830. 2 indexed citations

5.

Shen, Guang‐Ping, Heather Galick, Masaaki Inoue, & Susan S. Wallace. (2003). Decline of nuclear and mitochondrial oxidative base excision repair activity in late passage human diploid fibroblasts. DNA repair. 2(6). 673–693. 29 indexed citations

6.

Shen, Guang‐Ping, et al.. (2001). The Aα6 locus: its relation to mating-type regulation of sexual development in Schizophyllum commune. Current Genetics. 39(5-6). 340–345.

7.

Asada, Yasuhiko, et al.. (1997). Schixophyllum commune Aα Mating-Type Proteins, Y and Z, Form Complexes in All Combinations In Vitro. Genetics. 147(1). 117–123. 9 indexed citations

8.

Shen, Guang‐Ping, Dong-Chul Park, Roman Ullrich, & Charles P. Novotny. (1996). Cloning and characterization of aSchizophyllum gene withAβ6 mating-type activity. Current Genetics. 29(2). 136–142. 21 indexed citations

9.

Shen, Guang‐Ping, et al.. (1996). Cloning and characterization of a Schizophyllum gene with Aβ6 mating-type activity. Current Genetics. 29(2). 136–142. 2 indexed citations

10.

Yang, Huiling, et al.. (1995). The Aα Mating-Type Transcripts of Schizophyllum commune. Experimental Mycology. 19(1). 16–25. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact