782 total citations 15 papers, 514 citations indexed
About
Gregory Druck is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Signal Processing.
According to data from OpenAlex, Gregory Druck has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 514 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 2 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 2 papers in Signal Processing. Recurrent topics in Gregory Druck's work include Topic Modeling (10 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (7 papers) and Machine Learning and Data Classification (5 papers). Gregory Druck is often cited by papers focused on Topic Modeling (10 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (7 papers) and Machine Learning and Data Classification (5 papers). Gregory Druck collaborates with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Spain. Gregory Druck's co-authors include Andrew McCallum, Gideon Mann, Burr Settles, Xiaojin Zhu, Chris Pal, Andrew McCallum, Gerome Miklau, Kedar Bellare, Bo Pang and Fernando Díaz and has published in prestigious journals such as arXiv (Cornell University), Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
In The Last Decade
Gregory Druck
15 papers
receiving
459 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Gregory Druck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gregory Druck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gregory Druck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gregory Druck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gregory Druck. The network helps show where Gregory Druck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gregory Druck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gregory Druck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gregory Druck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gregory Druck. Gregory Druck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Díaz, Fernando, et al.. (2014). Overview of the NTCIR-11 Cooking Recipe Search Task.. NTCIR.7 indexed citations
2.
Druck, Gregory & Bo Pang. (2012). Spice it up? Mining Refinements to Online Instructions from User Generated Content. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 545–553.10 indexed citations
Druck, Gregory, Kuzman Ganchev, & Joäo Graça. (2011). Rich Prior Knowledge in Learning for Natural Language Processing. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 5–5.2 indexed citations
Druck, Gregory, Gerome Miklau, & Andrew McCallum. (2008). Learning to Predict the Quality of Contributions to Wikipedia. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst).29 indexed citations
Druck, Gregory, Mukund Narasimhan, & Paul Viola. (2007). Learning A* underestimates: Using inference to guide inference. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 99–106.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.