Grégoire Côté

2.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Grégoire Côté is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Grégoire Côté has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 3 papers in Information Systems and 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Grégoire Côté's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Research Data Management Practices (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Grégoire Côté is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Research Data Management Practices (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Grégoire Côté collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Grégoire Côté's co-authors include Andrew Plume, Michiel Schotten, Jeroen Baas, Éric Archambault, Vincent Larivière, Étienne Vignola‐Gagné, David Campbell, Benoît Macaluso, Stuart Edmonds and Dinar Kale and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientometrics, The British Journal of Social Work and Technology Analysis and Strategic Management.

In The Last Decade

Grégoire Côté

8 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies

2020 998 citations Jeroen Baas, Michiel Schotten et al. Quantitative Science Studies profile →

Peers

Grégoire Côté

SPU

SPS

IS

EE

SM

Satu Alakangas United Kingdom

Andrew Plume Netherlands

Jeroen Baas Netherlands

Alberto Martín‐Martín Spain

Rickard Danell Sweden

Antonio Perianes‐Rodríguez Spain

Weishu Liu China

Jesper Wiborg Schneider Denmark

David Pendlebury United States

Michael Gusenbauer Austria

Satu Alakangas United Kingdom

Grégoire Côté

315 ×0.8

SPU

187 ×0.9

SPS

192 ×1.0

IS

109 ×0.7

EE

209 ×1.4

SM

Citations per year, relative to Grégoire Côté Grégoire Côté (= 1×) peers Satu Alakangas

Countries citing papers authored by Grégoire Côté

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grégoire Côté's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grégoire Côté with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grégoire Côté more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grégoire Côté

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grégoire Côté. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grégoire Côté. The network helps show where Grégoire Côté may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Grégoire Côté

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Grégoire Côté. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Grégoire Côté based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Grégoire Côté. Grégoire Côté is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Baas, Jeroen, et al.. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies. 1(1). 377–386. 998 indexed citations breakdown →

2.

Archambault, Éric, et al.. (2016). Research impact of paywalled versus open access papers. Insecta mundi. 24 indexed citations

3.

Marjanovic, Sonja, Enora Robin, Catherine A. Lichten, et al.. (2015). A Review of the Dementia Research Landscape and Workforce Capacity in the United Kingdom. RAND Corporation eBooks. 7 indexed citations

4.

Campbell, David, et al.. (2015). Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment. The British Journal of Social Work. 46(5). 1282–1300. 2 indexed citations

5.

Campbell, David, Grégoire Côté, Stuart Edmonds, et al.. (2010). Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada. American Journal of Evaluation. 31(1). 66–83. 94 indexed citations

6.

Simonetti, Roberto, Éric Archambault, Grégoire Côté, & Dinar Kale. (2007). The Dynamics of Pharmaceutical Patenting in India: Evidence from USPTO Data. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 19(5). 625–642. 14 indexed citations

7.

Archambault, Éric, et al.. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics. 68(3). 329–342. 367 indexed citations

8.

Archambault, Éric, Grégoire Côté, & Yves Gingras. (2004). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Mental Health in the Workplace in Canada, 1991-2002. A Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy. 5(2). 133–140. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact