Graham Smith

211 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Graham Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 512
  • Inorganic Chemistry 710
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 533
  • Organic Chemistry 656
  • Developmental Neuroscience 85
Replace Takashi Hayashi with:
Takashi Hayashi Japan
Ka‐Leung Wong Hong Kong
Lu Wang China
David L. Morse United States
Manabu Abe Japan
Ivan J. Dmochowski United States
Stefan Zahn Germany
Timothy Smith United Kingdom
Tianshe Yang China
Ying‐Chih Lin Taiwan
Graham Smith relative to Takashi Hayashi Japan Takashi Hayashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Takashi Hayashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Smith. The network helps show where Graham Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graham Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graham Smith Line = papers co-authored together Graham Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 218 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964180
2 2009139
3 1998126
4 2008111
5 202073
6 201662
7 201253
8 201251
9 200950
10 199150
11 199747
12 200046
13 196846
14 201345
15 200145
16 196545
17 199744
18 201043
19 196642
20 200841

About Graham Smith

Graham Smith is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 218 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystal structures of chemical compounds (88 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (68 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (23 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (20 papers), Structural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds (18 papers), Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities (11 papers), Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (11 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (512 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (710 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (533 citations), Organic Chemistry (656 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (85 citations). Graham Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include U.D. Wermuth, Eric O. Aboagye, Q. Johnson, Quang‐Dé Nguyen, George Harauz, Colin H. L. Kennard, Jonathan M. White, D.E. Lynch, Meg Perumal and Matthias Glaser. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications, Australian Journal of Chemistry, Acta Crystallographica Section C Structural Chemistry, Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online and Tetrahedron Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact