Graham Cole
About
In The Last Decade
Graham Cole
2 papers receiving 678 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 553
- Epidemiology 82
- Surgery 67
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 66
- Economics and Econometrics 55
Countries citing papers authored by Graham Cole
This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Cole more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Cole
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Cole. The network helps show where Graham Cole may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Cole
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Cole. Graham Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | The annual global economic burden of heart failure breakdown → | 676 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.